Cognition of ourselves through cognition of the culture of our ethnic group
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2023.4.16Keywords:
Tuvans; Tuva; critical review; Tuvan studies; conceptualization of ethnoculture; culture concept; thesaurus approach; Indigenous MethodologyAbstract
The article provides a review of the monograph "Tuvans: Native People" (St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya, 2022). Its authors, ethnic Tuvan women (Ch. K. Lamazhaa, N. D. Suvandii, Sh. Yu. Kuzhuget, Sh. B. Mainy), have dedicated their work to comprehending and delineating the culture intimately linked to them through birthright, linguistic communication, and inseparable cohabitation.
The authors of this review, ethnic Kazakh women, contemplate the monographic exploration encapsulated within the linguistic confines of the Russian language by ethnic Tuvan women, particularly focusing on their compelling authorial subjectivity. What characterizes the nature of such authorial positioning within the monograph? How does their methodology differ from the perspectives of their colleagues who share Tuvan origins?
The accentuated subjectivity of the authors has led to the formulation of their unique concept — the thesaurus approach, which they label as the Russian iteration of Indigenous Methodology. From this emphatically articulated epistemological stance, the scholars scrutinize antecedent outsider and insider research methodologies concerning the study of Tuvan culture and its genesis. They delve into the essence of pivotal concepts constituting the “nucleus” of the Tuvan cultural repository: ög, kuda, urug-daryg, mal, all subsumed under a unified, clan-based concept — tөrel. Drawing from their perspective, Tuvan colleagues draw a crucial inference, one pertinent to researchers from diverse indigenous communities within the Russian Federation and the Central Asian region: Tuvan culture fundamentally rests upon the framework of kinship ties.
In the process of dissecting the monograph authored by Tuvan scholars, an overarching objective crystallizes for each insider scholar — to introspectively comprehend themselves. To shift the focus from the object of study to themselves as subjects, unwilling to perpetuate the role of “victims” in relation to the “metropolis”, a convenient posture that absolves them from accountability for the state of their people's culture and the academic discipline devoted to it.
References
Alektorov, A. E. (2013) Ukazatel' knig, zhurnal'nykh i gazetnykh stateĭ i zametok o kirgizakh (o kazakhakh) [Index of books, magazine and newspaper articles and notes about the Kyrgyz (about the Kazakhs)]. In: Klassicheskie issledovaniia [Classical studies] / ed. by U. K. Kalizhanova. Almaty, Ədebiet əlemі. Vol. 13. 976 p. Pp. 117, 286–287. (In Russ.).
Auezov, M. M. (1997) Ippokrena. Khozhdenie k kolodtsu vremen [Hippocrene. Walking to the Well of Times]. Almaty, Zhibek zholy Publ. 170 p. (In Russ.).
Gachev, G. D. (1988) Natsional'nye obrazy mira [Ethnic images of the world] Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel'. 448 p. (In Russ.).
Dagylga: tuvinskie obriady osviashcheniia v XXI veke [Dagylga: Tuvan rites of consecration in the 21st century] (2021) / ed. by Ch. K. Lamazhaa and N. D. Suvandii. Kyzyl, s. n. 188 p. (In Russ. and Tuv.).
Kisel', V. A. (2009) Poezdka za krasnoi sol'iu. Pogrebal'nye obriady Tuvy. XVIII — nachalo XXI v. [А Journey for the red salt. Funeral rites of Tuva. XVIII — early XXI century]. St. Petersburg, Kunstkamera. 142 p. (In Russ.).
Kodar, A. (2006) Zov bytiia [The Call of Being]. Almaty, Taimas Publ. 528 p. (In Russ.).
Tuvintsy. Rodnye liudi [Tuvans. Native people] (2002) / Ch. K. Lamazhaa, N. D. Suvandii, Sh. Yu. Kuzhuget, Sh. B. Mainy, ed. by Ch. K. Lamazhaa and N. D. Suvandii. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia. 360 p. (In Russ.).
Öövüs. Vozvrashchenie tuvinskoi iurty [Öövüs. Return of the Tuvan yurt] (2022) / ed. by Ch. K. Lamazhaa and N. D. Suvandii. Kyzyl, s. n. 85 p. (In Russ.).
Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2021) Ocherki sovremennoi tuvinskoi kul'tury [Essays on modern Tuvan culture]. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia. 192 p. (In Russ.).
Lamazhaa, Ch. K. and Bakhtikireeva, U. M. (2022) «Prokliatye zhizni» i tsennostnyi krizis v tuvinskom obshchestve [“Cursed lives” and the crisis of values in Tuvan society]. New Research of Tuva, no. 1, pp. 266–275. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.1.18
Lotman, Yu. M. (1992) Izbrannye stat'i [Selected articles] : in 3 vol. Tallin, Aleksandra. Vol. I. Stat'i po semiotike i topologii kul'tury [Articles on semiotics and topology of culture.]. 478 p. (In Russ.).
Lotman, Yu. M. (2002) Stat'i po semiotike kul'tury i iskusstva [Articles on the semiotics of culture and art]. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskii proekt. 543 p. (In Russ.).
Popkov, Yu. V. (2022) Retsenziia na knigu: Dagylga: tuvinskie obriady osviashcheniia v XXI veke / pod red. Ch. K. Lamazhaa, N. D. Suvandii. Kyzyl, 2021. 188 s. [Review of Lamazhaa, Ch. K., and Suvandii, N. D., eds. Dagylga: tuvinskie obriady osviashcheniia v XXI veke [Dagylga: Tuvan rites of consecration in the 21st century]. Kyzyl, 2021. 188 p.]. RUDN Journal of Russian History, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 300–304. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-300-304
Fatland, E. (2018) Sovetistan. Odisseia po Tsentral'noi Azii: Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Tadzhikistan, Kirgizstan i Uzbekistan glazami norvezhskogo antropologa [Sovietistan. Odyssey through Central Asia: Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan through the eyes of a Norwegian anthropologist]. Moscow, RIPOLklassik. 528 p. (In Russ.).
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. and Minkov, M. (2010) Culture and Organization: Software of the Mind. London, McGraw-Hill. 576 p.
Oelschlägel, A. C. (2013) Der Taigageist. Berichte und Geschichten von Menschen und Geistern aus Tuwa. Zeitgenössische Sagen und andere Folkloretexte / Dukh-khoziain taigi — Sovremennye predaniia i drugie fol'klornye materialy iz Tuvy / Taiga eezi — Bolgan tavarylgalar bolgash Tyvadan chygdyngan aas chogaalynyng öske-daa materialdary. Marburg, Tectum-Verlag. 220 p.
Zorbas, K. (2021) Shamanic Dialogues with the Invisible Dark in Tuva, Siberia. The Cursed Lives. Cambridge Scholar Publishing. 125 p.
Published
How to Cite
For citation:
Bakhtikireeva U. M., Shagimgereyeva B. E. and Amalbekova M. B. Poznanie samikh sebia cherez poznanie kul’tury svoego etnosa [Cognition of ourselves through cognition of the culture of our ethnic group]. New Research of Tuva, 2023, no. 4, pp. 226-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2023.4.16
Issue
Section
Author Biographies
Uldanai M. Bakhtikireeva, RUDN University
Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of Russian and Intercultural Communication, Institute of Russian Language, RUDN University.
Postal address: Off. 283, 10a Miklukho-Maklay St., 117198, Moscow, Russia.
Email: uldanai@mail.ru
Bakytgul E. Shagimgereyeva, M. Utemisov West Kazakhstan University
Ph.D. in Philology, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Russian Philology, M. Utemisov West Kazakhstan University.
Postal address: 162, N. Nazarbayev St., 090000, Uralsk, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Email: t_2004@mail.ru
Maral B. Amalbekova, L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
Doctor of of Philological Science, Associate Professor, Department of theory and practice of translation, L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University.
Postal address: 2, K. Satpayev St., 010010, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Email: maraluspen@mail.ru
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.
