Names of Leather Vessels in Mongolic Languages and Turkic Languages of Siberia (Comparative Perspective)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2026.3.24Keywords:
leather vessel, Turkic language, Mongolic language, tableware vocabularyAbstract
The article examines the names of domestic leather vessels among peoples speaking Turkic languages of Siberia and northern Mongolic languages. The authors analyze these lexical items in historical perspective and in the context of long-term contacts between the respective communities, demonstrating that units related to everyday life and household activities are particularly sensitive to cultural influences and often preserve traces of ancient connections. The empirical material comprises data from several Siberian Turkic and Mongolic languages, supplemented by numerous dictionaries and field notes.
Words denoting leather and leather vessels are systematized into semantic groups, with their meanings and shifts traced, including the transition from the general meaning “leather” to the designation of specific household items. The analysis makes it possible to identify common roots and borrowings, as well as cases in which formally similar lexemes acquire different semantic nuances in different languages. Particular attention is paid to the names of vessels whose origins are associated with figurative characteristics of their external appearance or shape. The authors show how words with meanings related to the body, figure, or volume develop into names of leather bags, wineskins, and other containers, and record semantic shifts whereby primary meanings linked to body parts or raw material come to designate everyday objects.
The conclusions emphasize that the system of names for leather vessels reflects prolonged and intensive interaction between Turkic- and Mongolic-speaking peoples. It is shown that in a number of Siberian Turkic languages certain elements going back to the Mongolic tradition have been preserved, although their meaning and usage may have changed significantly. The authors argue for the necessity of further comprehensive study of this vocabulary as an important source for reconstructing cultural contacts and household practices in the region.
References
Balzhinimaeva, B. D. (2017) Names of leather vessels and containers in Mongolic languages. Byulleten’ Kalmytskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, vol. 31, issue 3, pp. 110–118. (In Russ.)
Böttling, O. N. (1990) On the language of the Yakuts. Transl. from German by V. I. Rassadin. Novosibirsk, Nauka. 646 p. (In Russ.)
Burykin, A. A. (2017) On the scope and character of Turkic–Mongolic and Turkic–Tungusic–Manchu lexical ties in a new perspective: the role of the theory of kinship of the Altaic languages in revealing ancient language contacts. Byulleten’ Kalmytskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, vol. 33, issue 5, pp. 190–198. (In Russ.)
Dybo, A. V. (1996) Semantic reconstruction in Altaic etymology. Somatic terms (shoulder girdle). Moscow, YaSK. 393 p. (In Russ.)
Kaluzhinskiy, S. (1961) Some issues of Mongolic borrowings in the Yakut language (preliminary remarks based on materials from E. K. Pekarskiy’s “Dictionary of the Yakut language”). Trudy Instituta yazyka, literatury i istorii YaF SO AN SSSR, issue 3 (8), pp. 5–21. (In Russ.)
Kaluzhinski, St. (1978) Etymological studies in the Yakut language. Disyllabic stems (II). Rocznik orientalistyczny, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 71–82. (In Russ.)
Lexicon of traditional animal husbandry in Turkic and Mongolic languages: a comparative-contrastive perspective (2024). S. M. Trofimova et al.; ed. by I. A. Nevskaya. Novosibirsk, Akademizdat. 300 p. (In Russ.)
Nikolaev, E. R. (2021) Lexico-semantic features of names for leather vessels (containers) for kumys in the Yakut language. Severo-Vostochnyy gumanitarnyy vestnik, no. 1 (34), pp. 96–107. (In Russ.)
Pallas, P. S. (1773) Journey through various provinces of the Russian Empire, in 3 parts. Saint Petersburg, Imperatorskaya akademiya nauk. Part 1. 857 p. (In Russ.)
Rassadin, V. I. (1981) Problems of common features in the Turkic languages of the Sayan–Altai region. In: Turkological collection 1977, ed. by A. N. Kononov. Moscow, Nauka, Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoy literatury. 298 p. Pp. 219–231. (In Russ.)
Rassadin, V. I. (1980) Mongol–Buryat borrowings in Siberian Turkic languages. Moscow, Nauka. 115 p. (In Russ.)
Rassadin, V. I. (2007) On problems of etymologizing words of Mongolic languages. Mongolovedenie, vol. 4 (1), pp. 27–39. (In Russ.)
Sodnompilova, M. M. and Nanzatov, B. Z. (2020) Five kinds of livestock as the basis of the nomadic economy of Turkic–Mongolic peoples of Inner Asia. Izvestiya Laboratorii drevnikh tekhnologiy, vol. 16, no. 1 (34), pp. 131–140. (In Russ.)
Comparative-historical grammar of the Turkic languages. Lexicon (2001). 2nd ed., expanded; ed. by E. R. Tenishev. Moscow, Nauka. 821 p. (In Russ.)
Tatarintsev, B. I. (1976) Mongolian linguistic influence on Tuvan vocabulary. Kyzyl, Tuvan Book Publishing House. 129 p. (In Russ.)
Tsincius, V. I. (1979) Problems of comparative-historical study of the lexicon of the Altaic languages. In: Research in the field of etymology of Altaic languages, ed. by V. I. Tsincius. Leningrad, Nauka, Leningrad branch. 263 p. Pp. 3–17. (In Russ.)
Shirobokova, N. N. (2015) On change of classification type (based on Siberian Turkic languages). Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal, no. 4, pp. 242–250. (In Russ.)
Shcherbak, A. M. (1966) On the nature of lexical interrelations of Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic–Manchu languages. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, no. 3, pp. 21–35. (In Russ.)
Shcherbak, A. M. (1986) Turkic–Mongolic language contacts. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, no. 4, pp. 47–59. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
For citation:
Danilova N. I. and Trofimova S. M. Names of Leather Vessels in Mongolic Languages and Turkic Languages of Siberia (Comparative Perspective). New Research of Tuva, 2026, no. 3, pp. 417-427. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2026.3.24
Supporting Agencies
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.


