Metaphor as a means of visualizing an object of naming in media texts (a case study of the Russian, English, Tatar and Tuvan languages)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.4.18

Keywords:

metaphor; semantic model; visualization; mass media; anthropocentrism; Tuvan language; Russian language; English language; Tatar language

Abstract

The article identifies metaphorical models that determine the principles of verbal visualization of the realities of culture and show business in media texts. It incorporates materials of multi-structural unrelated / not closely related languages (Russian, English, Tatar, Tuvan).

It has been found out that these models have different potential in terms of figurative representation of the phenomenon being designated. Systemic (linguistic) metaphors hold the least potential being widely replicated and therefore devoid of the effect of novelty (Rus. звезда / zvezda; Eng. star; Tat. йолдоз / ioldoz; Tuv. сылдыс / syldys). More ample imaginative possibilities are typical for metaphorical models that reflect specific associative connections of concepts (Rus. ад / ad; Eng. bubble, cloud; Tat. өзү / ozu; Tuv. аскымнаар / askymnaar; et al.).

The models are largely universal in nature, that is, they are presented in four/three languages that are analyzed (“physical action → emotional impact”, “heavenly body → human being”, etc.). In some cases, there is a parallelism of semantic structures of multilingual lexemes (Rus. рассадник / rassadnik; Eng. breeding; etc.).

Unique models of metaphorization, which are based on associative relations of concepts that are difficult to explain from a logical point of view, are characteristic of only one of the languages under study, for instance: “physiological impact → intellectual/emotional impact” (in English), “movement → speech activity” (in Tuvan), etc.

It is shown that most of the metaphorical images used in media texts correlate with the anthropomorphic and objective codes of culture: the inner form of the analyzed lexemes is associated either with the animation of processes, states, etc., or with their objectification. The active use of metaphorical means in media texts is partly due to the predominance of the visual principle in contemporary culture. This principle facilitates the perception of a message and deciphering its meaning.

References

Arutiunova, N. D. (1990) Metafora i diskurs [Metaphor and discourse]. In: Teoriia metafory [Theory of metaphor] / ed. by N. D. Arutiunov. Moscow, Progress. 511 p. Pp. 5–32. (In Russ.).

Baranov, A. N. (2014) Deskriptornaia teoriia metafory [Descriptive theory of metaphor]. Moscow, Iazyki slavianskoi kul'tury. 632 p. (In Russ.).

Wei Xiao (2021) Funktsii politicheskoi metafory v sovremennykh elektronnykh SMI (na materiale setevogo izdaniia «Gazeta.ru») [Political metaphor functioning in the modern electronic media (a case study of the online newspaper “Gazeta.ru”)]. Philology. Theory & Practice, vol. 14, issue 5, pp. 1453–1458. (In Russ.).

Zalizniak, A. A. (2013) Semanticheskii perekhod kak ob"ekt tipologii [Semantic transition as an object of typology]. Voprosy iazykoznaniia, no. 2, pp. 32–51. (In Russ.).

Kiseleva, L. A. and Todosienko, Z. V. (2019) Kognitivnye osnovaniia semanticheskoi derivatsii v raznostrukturnykh iazykakh [Cognitive foundations of semantic derivation in differential languages]. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 1, pp. 21–29. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2019-1-21-29

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2004) Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors we live by] / transl. from Engl. Moscow, Editorial URSS. 252 p. (In Russ.).

Novitskaya, I. V. (2019) Lingvistika XXI veka na puti k integrativnoi teorii metafory [Linguistics of the 21st century on the path to the integrated theory of metaphor]. Siberian Journal of Philology, no. 3, pp. 143–157. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/18137083/68/13

Oparina, E. O. (2000) Issledovanie metafory v poslednei treti XX v. [The study of metaphor in the last third of the 20th century]. In: Lingvisticheskie issledovaniia v kontse XX v. [Linguistic research in the late 20th century] : A collection of reviews / ed. by F. M. Berezin. Moscow, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the RAS. 214 p. Pp. 186–204. (In Russ.).

Simakova, S. I. (2018) Vizual'nyi povorot — novaia filosofiia obraza v sredstvakh massovoi kommunikatsii [Visual turn — new philosophy of image in means of mass communication]. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, no. 10 (420), Philology Sciences, issue 114, pp. 225–232. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1994-2796-2018-11032

Smirnitskaya, A. A. (2016) Semantika terminov rodstva v tamil'skom iazyke s tochki zreniia tipologii semanticheskikh perekhodov [Semantics of kinship terms in Tamil from the point of view of the typology of semantic transitions]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriia: Lingvistika, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 112–127. (In Russ.).

Chudinov, A. P. (2013) Ocherki po sovremennoi politicheskoi metaforologii [Essays on modern political metaphorology]. Yekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University. 176 p. (In Russ.).

Bertin, J. (1967) Sémiologie graphique. Paris, Mouton/Gauthier-Villars. 436 p.

Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2006) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London : Routledge. xviii, 291 p.

The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2014) / ed. by C. Jewitt. London : Routledge. xxvi, 527 p.

Published

30.11.2022

How to Cite

Киселева Л. А., Тодосиенко З. В., Лукманова Р. Р., Куулар Е. М. Метафора как средство визуализации объекта наименования в медиатекстах (на материале русского, английского, татарского и тувинского языков) // Новые исследования Тувы. 2022. № 4. С. 243-256. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.4.18

For citation:
Kiseleva L. A., Todosienko Z. V., Lukmanova R. R. and Kuular E. M. Metafora kak sredstvo vizualizatsii ob’ekta nai­menovaniia v mediatekstakh (na materiale russkogo, angliiskogo, tatarskogo i tuvinskogo iazykov) [Metaphor as a means of visualizing an object of naming in media texts (a case study of the Russian, English, Tatar and Tuvan languages)]. New Research of Tuva, 2022, no. 4, pp. 243-256 (In Russ.). DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.4.18

Issue

Section

Dialogue of cultures

Author Biographies

Larisa A. Kiseleva, Samara National Research University

Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of Russian Language and Mass Communication, Samara National Research University.

Postal address: 34 Moskovskoye shosse, 443086 Samara, Russian Federation.

Tel.: +7 (846) 267-43-73; +7 (927) 234-49-80.

E-mail: lorentsia09@yandex.ru

Zarrina V. Todosienko, Ufa University of Science and Technology

Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Humanities Faculties, Ufa University of Science and Technology.

Postal address: 32 Zaki Validi St., 450076 Ufa, Russian Federation.

Tel.: +7 (347) 272-63-70; +7 (927) 084-32-99.

E-mail: venusjupiter@mail.ru

Renata R. Lukmanova, Ufa University of Science and Technology

Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Modern Russian Linguistics; Deputy Dean for Research; Faculty of Philology; Director, Center “ESG-Growth Models of New Ecoterritories”, Ufa University of Science and Technology.

Postal address: 32 Zaki Validi St., 450076 Ufa, Russian Federation.

Tel.: +7 (347) 272-63-70; +7 (937) 331-96-90.

E-mail: renata89373319690@gmail.com

Elena M. Kuular, Tuvan State University

Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Tuvan Philology and General Linguistics, Tuvan State University.

Postal address: 36 Lenin St., 667000 Kyzyl, Russian Federation.

Tel.: +7 (394-22) 5-22-50.

E-mail: kuular-e-m@mail.ru

Most read articles by the same author(s)