Khakasses under the conditions of globalization: mental deformations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2017.3.6Keywords:
globalization; mentality; mental deformations; Khakass; hierarchy of values; motherlandAbstract
The article analyzes the deformations in the mentality of the Khakas, a Turkic-speaking ethnos of South Siberia. The authors understand mentality as an internally consistent mode of a people’s existence for the sake of survival of the ethnos as a whole by means of organizing knowledge into an ethnic worldview; through the creation of a stable hierarchy of ethnically articulated needs, interests and values; through a system of auto- and heterostereotypes; and by developing sustainable forms of behavior in various situations. Due to both external and internal impact, the mentality, a historically stable phenomenon, can suffer deformations. We understand these as a change in the basic elements of the mentality (needs, interests, values) leading to reversible or irreversible transformations for the people.
To document the mental deformations among the Khakass, the article compares traditional ethnic values with modern ones. The comparison makes use of two studies of values: an interdisciplinary study of the traditional outlook of the ethnos conducted in mid-1990s, an a sociological survey held in 2015.
The analysis revealed that the hierarchy of basic traditional values, such as "native land", "Khakass people", "family" preserves its importance for ethnic actors as a resource for the preservation and development of the ethnos even under the conditions of globalization. However, the sociological survey recorded a change in the configuration of the entire value system among the Khakass people. “Family" as a value moves upfront, which follows the general historical pattern: an ethnos in a state of crisis returns to the basic, time-tested social institutions (family, clan). The latter are called upon to preserve the ethnos as a biopsychosocial community.
References
Abbas, A. G. (2010) Fol'klor i mental'nost' [Folklore and mentality]. Vestnik MGUKI, November-December, no. 6 (38), pp. 63–66. (In Russ.)
Akulich, M. M. (2011) Mentalitet, mirovozzrenie i obshchestvennoe soznanie kak osnovy sotsial'noi modernizatsii [The mentality, worldview and social consciousness as the basis of social modernization]. Vestnik Tiumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 8, pp. 176–181. (In Russ.)
Anzhiganova, L. V. (1999). Evoliutsiia mirovozzreniia etnosa: na primere khakasskogo naroda [The evolution of the worldview of ethnos: The case study of Khakass people]: Diss. … Doctor of Philosophy. Moscow. 450 p. (In Russ.)
Bloch, M. (1998) Koroli-chudotvortsy: Ocherk predstavlenii o sverkh"estestvennom kharaktere korolevskoi vlasti, rasprostranennykh preimushchestvenno vo Frantsii i v Anglii [The Royal Touch: Monarchy and Miracles in France and England]. Moscow, Iazyki russkoi kul'tury. 712 p. (In Russ.)
Veriaskina, A. N. (2016) Mentalitet : problema sushchnosti i soderzhaniia [Mentality : the problem of its essense and content]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo instituta upravleniia RANKhiGS, vol. IV, pp. 35–38. (In Russ.)
Gurevich, A. Ia. (1989) Problema mental'nostei v sovremennoi istoriografii [The problem of mentalities in modern historiography]. In: Vseobshchaia istoriia: diskussii, novye podkhody [General history: discussions and new approaches]. Vol. 1. Ed. by A. Chubar'ian and V. Sogrin. Moscow, Nauka. 216 p. Pp. 75–89. (In Russ.).
Durkheim, E. (1992) Sotsiologiia i teoriia poznaniia [Sociology and theory of knowledge]. In: Istoriia psikhologii (10-e — 30-e gg. Period otkrytogo krizisa): Teksty [History of psychology (1910s-30s: the period of open crisis): Texts]. 2nd ed. / ed. by P. Ia Gal'perin and A. I. Zhdan. Moscow, Moskovskii universitet Publ. 364 p. Pp. 293–297. (In Russ.).
Freud, Z. (1992). Psikhoanaliz. Religiia. Kul'tura [Psychoanalysis. Religion. Culture]. Moscow, Renessans. 296 з. (In Russ.).
Eliade, M. (1996) Aspekty mifa [Aspects of the myth]. Moscow, Invest — PPP; ST «PPP». 240 p. (In Russ.).
Jung, C. G. (1994) O sovremennykh mifakh [About modern myths]. Moscow, Praktika. 252 p. (In Russ.).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.