Traditional and Western Buddhism in Russia: a comparative study
Keywords:
traditional Buddhism; Tibetan Buddhism; Western Buddhism; Buddhist communities; Russian Buddhism; Neo-BuddhismAbstract
The article examines the history of the arrival and spread of Buddhism, including the versions that came from the West in late 20th century, in the regions of Russia where indigenous population have traditionally followed the Mahāyāna – the northern, i.e. Tibetan version of Buddhism (Kalmykia, Buryatia, Tuva, Zabaikalski Krai (Transbaikalia) and Irkutsk Oblast).
Being followers of the Mahāyāna, most Russian Buddhists largely belong to the Gelug school, with a certain number of followers of other schools of Tibetan Buddhism – Karma Kagyu, Nyingma and Sakya. The overall number of practicing Buddhists in Russia does not exceed 500,000. There are about 900,000 ‘Ethnic Buddhists’ in Buryatia, Kalmykia and Tuva. The organizational structure and doctrine of Buryat, Mongol and Kalmyk Buddhism is akin to those in Mongolian Buddhism.
Besides developing its own traditional Buddhism, since the 1990s Russia has been influenced by a different version of this religion – a Buddhism adapted to Western mentality and lifestyle. Western-style Buddhist communities typically contrast themselves to traditional Kalmyk, Buryat and Tuvan communities and present their lifestyles as the only appropriate ones for European Russians. Although they claim possessing a direct religious and dogmatic link between their teachings and Tibetan Buddhism, in fact those are their own versions of Buddhism.
At the moment in European Russia there are about 200 independent Buddhist communities and organizations of Western-style Buddhism. They are largely concentrated in Russia’s biggest cities – Moscow, St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk, etc. The most active of them is the “International Association of Karma Kagyu School Buddhists”, registered in 1993. Religious studies scholars classify it as a Neo-Buddhist cult adapted to the religious needs of its followers to provide fast access to ‘efficient’ and ‘occult’ Tibetan ritual practices. The same path has been chosen by the Association of Dzogchen Communities and the Rimei Community (both have beeт active in St. Petersburg since 1989-1991).
The revival of Buddhism as one of Russia’s religions goes beyond the rebuilding of the old temples and the construction of new ones in Buddhism’s traditional domain. The process is augmented by the rise of the communities which popularize new models of religious life adapted from the West without any specific Tibetan Buddhist historical and cultural prototypes.
References
Agadzhanian, A. S. (2008) Neobuddizm [Neo-Buddhism]. In: Entsiklopediia religii [Encyclopedia of religions] / ed. by A. P. Zabiiako, A. N. Krasnikov, E. S. Elbakian. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ. 1520 p. Pp. 861–862. (In Russ.).
Berzin, A. (1992) Tibetskii buddizm: ego istoriia i perspektivy razvitiia [Tibetan Buddhism: Its history and prospects] / tr. by V. Komarovskii. Moscow, Traditsionnaia meditsina Publ. 32 p. (In Russ.).
Dvorkin, A. L. (2000) Sektovedenie. Totalitarnye sekty. Opyt sistematicheskogo issledovaniia [Sectology. Totalitarian sects. A systemic study]. Nizhny Novgorod, St. Aleksandr Nevsky Brotherhood Publ. 693 p. (In Russ.)
Kliashtornyi, S. G. and Livshits, V. A. (1971) Sevraiskii kamen' [The stone of Sevrai]. Sovetskaia tiurkologiia, no. 3, pp. 106–112. (In Russ.).
Kadyrbaev, A. Sh. (1990) Tiurki i irantsy v Kitae i Tsentral'noi Azii. XIII–XIV vv. [Turks and Iranians in China and Central Asia: 13th – 14th centuries]. Alma-Ata, Gylym Publ. 158 p. (In Russ.).
Kuznetsov, B. I. (1961) Tibetskaia letopis' «Svetloe zertsalo tsarskikh rodoslovnykh» [The Mirror Illuminating the Royal Genealogies: A Tibetan chronicle]. Leningrad, Leningrad State University Publ. 122 p. (In Russ.)
Ostrovskaia, E. A. (1999) Buddiiskie mirskie obshchiny Sankt-Peterburga [Lay Buddhist communities in St. Petersburg]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, no. 3, pp. 107–113. (In Russ.)
Sovremennyi buddizm v Rossii [Contemporary Buddhism in Russia]. Osoznanie.org. Teoriia i praktika [online] Available at: http://osoznanie.org/975-sovremennyy-buddizm-v-rossii.html (accessed: 20.03.2015). (In Russ.)
Filatov, S. B. and Lunkin, R. N. (2005) Statistika rossiiskoi religioznosti: magiia tsifr i neodnoznachnaia real'nost' [The statistics of religiosity in Russia: the magic of figures and the complex reality]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, no. 6, pp. 35–45. (In Russ.)
Chökyi Nyima Rinpoche (1995) Putevoditel' po zhizni i smerti [The Bardo Guidebook] / tr. by B. Grebenshchikov. St. Petersburg, Otkrytyi mir Publ. 256 p. (In Russ.)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.