Tengrianism in the history and culture of the nomads of Central Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.3.8Keywords:
Tengrianism; shamanism; Buddhism; nomads; Mongolian peoples; Turkic peoples; Mongols; Apollonianism; DionysianismAbstract
The article deals with the issue of the role of Tengrianism in the history and culture of the nomads of Central Asia. The origin of Tengrianism is usually associated with the Hunnu (Xiongnu) people who created a large nomadic realm in this region. Tengrianism gained further development already in the age of the great Turkic khaganates where the ancestors of contemporary Turkic and Mongolian peoples lived. The final formation of Tengrianism as an imperial religion is associated with the emergence of new nomadic empires. Ancient Turkic runic monuments testify to the close connection of the Tengrian cult of Heaven with authority and the state.
During the formation of the Mongol Empire, the imperial cult of Heaven and the Tengrian ideology were again in demand, because they justified the legitimacy of the new government by the “will of Heaven” and united the diverse tribes and peoples of the Great Steppe with a common worldview. The cult of Heaven under Genghis Khan actually turned into an official religion which at the same time did not negate other confessions. Thereafter, Tengrianism as a politicized religious tradition gradually declined, giving way to Mahayana Buddhism, Islam, and shamanism.
An important element of the Tengrian teaching was the covenant to live in agreement and harmony with the natural world and its laws. Tengrianism, being a transitional stage from early religious forms to more advanced religions, had not yet developed a full-fledged system of theology and morality. Therefore, the nomads were focused primarily on the earthly life and not on the afterlife. With the help of cultural codes, Tengrianism was developing and maintaining specific mental characteristics in the nomadic society.
The author notes the connection between Tengrianism and the white shamanism of the peoples of Siberia, pointing out that white shamans and Tengri priests performed preeminently social rituals, worshipped gods of the Upper world, wore the same white clothes and rode white horses. The cult of the White Old Man — popular among the Mongolian peoples and Tuvans — is probably connected with Tengrianism.
The interaction of Tengrianism with Buddhism and shamanism is considered within the framework of the doctrine of the Apollonian and Dionysian principles that was developed by Friedrich Nietzsche. In this regard, Tengrianism, as well as Buddhism, can be defined as an Apollonian type of religion, while shamanism is a religious Dionysianism.
References
Abaev, N. V. (2015) Arkhaicheskie formy religii i tengrianstvo v etnokul'turogeneze narodov Vnutrennei Azii [Archaic forms of religion and Tengrianism in the ethnocultural genesis of the peoples of Inner Asia]. Ulan-Ude, Buryat State University. 248 p. (In Russ.).
Abaev, N. V. (2016) Tengrianstvo i buddizm makhaiany v istorii i filosofii buriat-mongol'skogo iskusstva edinoborstva «Shonyn-basha» [Tengrianism and Mahayana Buddhism in the history and philosophy of Buryat-Mongolian martial art “Shonyn-basha”]. Vestnik Tuvinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki, no. 1 (28), pp. 7–20. (In Russ.).
Aiupov, N. G. (2012) Tengrianstvo kak otkrytoe mirovozzrenie [Tengrianism as an open worldview]. Almaty, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University ; KIE Publ. 256 p. (In Russ.).
Aiazbekova, S. Sh. (2020) Tengrianstvo i dvoeverie tiurko-mongol'skikh narodov [Tengrism and dual faith of the Turkic-Mongolian peoples]. Respublica Literaria, vol. 1, no 2, pp. 150–165. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2020.1.2.150-165
Bicheev, B. A. (2021) Proiskhozhdenie kul'ta Belogo Startsa [The origin of the cult of the White Elder]. In: Tengrianstvo i epicheskoe nasledie narodov Evrazii: istoki i sovremennost' [Tengrianism and the epic heritage of the peoples of Eurasia: Origins and modernity] : Proceedings of the 8th International science-to-practice conference / ed. by L. V. Fedorova. Elista, Tengri International Research Foundation. 460 p. Pp. 67–77. (In Russ.).
Bicheev, B. A. and Altan-Ochir (2021) Kul't Belogo startsa (mongol'skie teksty iz Tuvy) [The cult of the White Old Man: Mongolian texts from Tuva]. New Research of Tuva, no. 1, pp. 174–187. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2021.1.9
Bicheev, B. A. and Kukeev, A. G. (2011) O religioznykh predstavleniiakh drevnikh tiurkov i mongolov [About religious ideas of the ancient Turks and Mongols]. Vestnik Kalmytskogo instituta gumanitarnykh issledovanii RAN, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 75–77. (In Russ.).
Buriaty [The Buryats] (2004) / ed. by L. L. Abaeva and N. L. Zhukovskaia. Moscow, Nauka. 633 p. (In Russ.).
Galdanova, G. R. (1997) Traditsionnye verovaniia buriat v sisteme buddizma [Traditional beliefs of the Buryats in the system of Buddhism]. In: Buriatskii buddizm: istoriia i ideologiia [Buryat Buddhism: History and ideology] / ed. by L. E. Yangutov. Ulan-Ude, Publ. House of Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the RAS. 149 p. Pp. 92–102. (In Russ.).
Gumilev, L. N. (2002) Drevnie tiurki [Ancient Turks]. St. Petersburg, Kristall ; Moscow, AST. 574 p. (In Russ.).
Drobyshev, Yu. I. (2012) Tengrianstvo i buddizm v srednevekovoi Mongolii [Tengrianism and Buddhism in medieval Mongolia]. Mirovozzrenie naseleniia Iuzhnoi Sibiri i Tsentral'noi Azii v istoricheskoi retrospektive, no. 5, pp. 71–90. (In Russ.).
Dugarov, D. S. (1991) Istoricheskie korni belogo shamanstva: na materiale obriadovogo fol'klora buriat [Historical roots of White shamanism: A case study of ritual folklore of the Buryats]. Moscow, Nauka. 300 p. (In Russ.).
Zhumaganbetov, T. S. (2006a) Kul't Tengri kak osnova gosudarstvennoi ideologii drevnetiurkskogo kaganata [The cult of Tengri as a basis for the state ideology of the ancient Turkic Kaganate]. Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost', no. 2, pp. 119–126. (In Russ.).
Zhumaganbetov, T. S. (2006b) Genezis gosudarstvenno-religioznoi ideologii v drevnetiurkskikh kaganatakh [The origin and development of state-religious ideology in early Turkic khaganates]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 4, pp. 154–162. (In Russ.).
Kliashtornyi, S. G. and Sultanov, T. I. (2004) Gosudarstva i narody evraziiskikh stepei. Drevnost' i srednevekov'e [States and peoples of the Eurasian steppes. Antiquity and the Middle Ages]. St. Petersburg, Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie. 362 p. (In Russ.).
Kodar, A. A. (2009a) Tengrianstvo v kontekste monoteizma [Tengrianism in the context of monotheism]. New Research of Tuva, no. 1–2, pp. 216–225. (In Russ.).
Kodar, A. A. (2009b) Tengrianstvo v svete nomadologii Deleza-Gvattari [Tengrizm in the light of nomadology of Deleuze-Guattari]. New Research of Tuva, no. 4, pp. 82–90. (In Russ.).
Kozin, S. A. (1941) Sokrovennoe skazanie: mongol'skaia khronika 1240 g. pod nazvaniem “Mongol un niruča tobèj an. Iuan' chao bi shi” : Mongol'skii obydennyi izbornik [A secret story: The 1240 Mongolian chronicle entitled “Mongol un niruča tobèj an. Yuan chao bi shi” : A Mongolian day-to-day anthology] : in 2 vols. Moscow ; Leningrad, Publ. House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Vol. 1. 619 p. (In Russ.).
Kradin, N. N. (2020) Imperiia Khunnu [The Xiongnu Empire] / 4th ed. St. Petersburg, Oleg Abyshko Publ. 304 p. (In Russ.).
Kudayarov, K. A. (2021) Rol' sufizma v perekhode kirgizov ot tengrianstva v islam [The role of Sufism in the transition of the Kyrgyz people from Tengrianism to Islam]. Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaia i zarubezhnaia literatura. Seriia 9: Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika, no. 2, pp. 57–66. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31249/rva/2021.02.03
Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2021) Tuva kak limitrofnaia zona: iazyk, religiia i identifikatsiia naseleniia [Tuva as a limitrophe zone: Language, religion and people’s identity]. New Research of Tuva, no. 3, pp. 178–194 (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2021.3.14
Lushnikov, O. V. (2014) Konfessional'naia politika Mongol'skoi imperii i Ulusa Dzhuchi v period rastsveta [Confessional policy of the Mongol Empire and Ulus of Jochi during their heyday]. Zolotoordynskaia tsivilizatsiia, no. 7, pp. 12–17. (In Russ.).
Malov, S. E. (1959) Pamiatniki drevnetiurkskoi pis'mennosti Mongolii i Kirgizii [Monuments of the ancient Turkic script of Mongolia and Kyrgyzstan]. Moscow ; Leningrad, Publ. House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. 111 p. (In Russ.).
Mify narodov mira: entsiklopediia [Myths of the peoples of the world: An encyclopedia] (1982) : in 2 vols. / ed. by S. A. Tokarev. Moscow, Sovetskaia entsiklopediia. Vol. 2. 719 p. (In Russ.).
Mikhailov, T. M. (1980) Iz istorii buriatskogo shamanizma (s drevneishikh vremen po XVIII v.) [From the history of Buryat shamanism (from ancient times to the 18th century)]. Novosibirsk, Nauka. 320 p. (In Russ.).
Mongush, M. V. (2001) Istoriia buddizma v Tuve (vtoraia polovina VI — konets XX v.) [The history of Buddhism in Tuva (latter half of the 6th — late 20th cc.)]. Novosibirsk, Nauka. 200 p. (In Russ.).
Nietzsche, F. (2010) Rozhdenie tragedii iz dukha muzyki [The birth of tragedy from the spirit of music]. In: Nietzsche, F. Maloe sobranie sochinenii [Small collection of works]. St. Petersburg, Publ. Group “Azbuka-klassika”. 1055 p. Pp. 7–134. (In Russ.).
Norbo, Sh. (1999) Zaia-pandita: materialy k biografii [Zaya-pandita: Materials for a biography]. Elista, Kalmyk Book Publishing House. 335 p. (In Russ.).
Rzaeva, R. O. (2012) Dikhotomiia «Zapad — ne-Zapad» v diskurse nezapadnoi sovremennosti i postmoderna [The “West — not-West” dichotomy in the discourse of non-Western modernity and postmodernity]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 12, pp. 86–94. (In Russ.).
Sydykov, A. N. (2014) Tengrianstvo — narodnaia vera [Tengrianism is the people’s faith]. Vestnik Bishkekskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, no. 1 (27), pp. 49–52. (In Russ.).
Skrynnikova, T. D. (1988) Lamaistskaia tserkov' i gosudarstvo. Vneshniaia Mongoliia. XVI — nachalo XX v. [The Lamaist Church and the state. Outer Mongolia. 16th — early 20th c.]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, Siberian Branch. 104 p. (In Russ.).
Skrynnikova, T. D. (2002) Solntse i Zemlia v panteone narodov Tsentral'noi i Vostochnoi Azii [The Sun and the Earth in the pantheon of the peoples of Central and East Asia]. In: Altaica VI / ed. by V. M. Alpatov. Moscow, Institute of Oriental Studies of the RAS. 195 p. Pp. 114–139. (In Russ.).
Troshchanskii, V. F. (1902) Evoliutsiia chernoi very (shamanstva) u iakutov [Evolution of the black faith (shamanism) among the Yakuts]. Kazan, Typolithography at Kazan University. 208 p. (In Russ.).
Ulanov, M. S. and Badmaev, V. N. (2020) Zhenskoe dukhovenstvo v istorii buddizma u mongol'skikh narodov Rossii [Women in the history of Buddhism among the Mongolian peoples of Russia]. Dialog so vremenem, no. 72, pp. 195–208. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21267/AQUILO.2020.72.72.012
Urbanaeva, I. S. (2000) Shamanskaia filosofiia buriat-mongolov: tsentral'noaziatskoe tengrianstvo v svete dukhovnykh uchenii [Shamanic philosophy of the Buryat Mongols: Central Asian Tengrianism in the light of spiritual teachings] : in 2 parts. Ulan-Ude, Publ. House of Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the RAS. Part 1. 265 p. (In Russ.).
Khvastunova, Yu. V. (2018) Sovremennoe tengrianstvo (na primere versii tengrianstva V. A. Sata v Respublike Altai) [Modern Tengriism (as in V. A. Sat’s version of Tengriism in the Altai Republic)]. Colloquium heptaplomeres, no. 5, pp. 33–43. (In Russ.).
Khomushku, O. M. (1998) Religiia v istorii kul'tury tuvintsev [Religion in the history of Tuvan culture]. Moscow, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the RAS. 177 p. (In Russ.).
Tsookhuu, Kh. (2014) Mongoly: kto my? [Mongols: Who are we?]. New Research of Tuva, no. 4, pp. 59–79. (In Russ.).
Güngör, H. (2013) Tengrism as a religious and political phenomenon in Turkish world: Tengriyanstvo. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, vol. 1, no. 19, pp. 196–204.
Ulanov, M. S., Badmaev, V. N. and Radionov, A. V. (2020) Woman’s status in the Kalmyk and Buryat Buddhist tradition: History and the current state. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1195–1206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0636
Published
How to Cite
For citation:
Ulanov M. S. Tengrianstvo v istorii i kul’ture nomadov Tsentral’noi Azii [Tengrianism in the history and culture of the nomads of Central Asia]. New Research of Tuva, 2022, no. 3, pp. 103-115. (In Russ.). DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.3.8
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.