The Problem of the Status of “Self” as an Anthropological Category in Buddhist Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2021.2.8Keywords:
anthropology of Buddhism; anatmavada; Russian Buddhology; nirvana; Tathagatagarbha; Vajrayana; transcendentalismAbstract
Drawing on the results of contemporary Russian Buddhist studies, the authors problematize such well-established ideas as the status of “I”, understanding of nirvana, the denial of the absolute, etc. It is shown that these concepts are not so unambiguous, they need to be clarified and deepened; they can have a contradictory dialectical character, this is especially true of such Mahayana schools as the Tathagatagarbha and the Vajrayana. The analysis of these problematic concepts and their clarification are necessary for an adequate understanding of both Buddhism in its historical development and the history of philosophy as a whole.
The authors reveal the unanimity of views of contemporary Russian Buddhologists on the need to distinguish between the empirical and the possible absolute “Self” in Buddhism, as well as to outline the difference in their ontological statuses. The article also provides a comparison with the concepts of “Self” in Western philosophical schools of thought, especially in the criticism of Immanuel Kant. The researchers note both the commonality of transcendental beliefs in Buddhism and Kantianism, and the difference in attitude to metaphysics, understanding of the spiritual and ethical. They consider apophatism in definition of nirvana and the transcendent and immanent nature of Buddhism in comparison with other teachings, primarily Christianity. The revealed problematicity of determining the fundamental principles and concepts of Mahayana requires further in-depth study of the history of the development of the philosophy of Buddhism.
References
Gaidenko, P. P. (1997) Proryv k transtsendentnomu : Novaia ontologiia XX veka [Breakthrough to the transcendent : A new ontology of the 20th century]. Moscow, Respublika. 495 p. (In Russ.).
Dmitriev, S. V. (2006) O nekotorykh aspektakh komparativnogo analiza buddiiskoi i sufiiskoi antropologii [On some aspects of comparative analysis of Buddhist and Sufi anthropology]. In: Tret'i Torchinovskie chteniia. Religiovedenie i vostokovedenie [Third Torchinov Readings. Religious studies and Oriental studies] : Proceedings of the scientific conference. St. Petersburg, February 15–18, 2006 / comp. and ed. by S. V. Pakhomov. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Publishing House. 355 p. Pp. 145–150. (In Russ.).
Kant, I. (1994) Sochineniia [Works] : in 8 vols. Moscow, Choro. Vol. 3. 741 p. (In Russ.).
Coseru, C. (2017) Soznanie, lichnaia identichnost' i debaty o «ia» / «ne-ia» [Consciousness, personal identity, and the self/no-self debate]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 10, pp. 130–140. (In Russ.).
Piatigorsky, A. P. (2007) Vvedenie v izuchenie buddiiskoi filosofii (deviatnadtsat' seminarov) [Introduction to the study of Buddhist philosophy (Nineteen seminars)]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 288 p. (In Russ.).
Rudoi, V. I. (1990) Vvedenie v buddiiskuiu filosofiiu [Introduction to Buddhist philosophy]. In: Vasubandkhu. Abkhidkharmakosha [Vasubandhu. Abhidharmakosha] / transl. by V. I. Rudoi. Moscow, Nauka. 318 p. Pp. 5–42. (In Russ.).
Torchinov, E. A. (2013) Vvedenie v buddizm [Introduction to Buddhism]. St. Petersburg, Amfora. 430 p. (In Russ.).
Urbanaeva, I. S. (2018) Buddiiskaia meditatsiia i fenomenologicheskii metod: osnovaniia i smysl sravneniia [Buddhist meditation and phenomenological method: The grounds for comparison and its meaning]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 2, pp. 177–187. (In Russ.).
Heidegger, M. (2007) Chto takoe metafizika? [What is metaphysics?] Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt. 303 p. (In Russ.).
Jaspers, K. (1994) Filosofskaia vera [Philosophical faith]. In: Jaspers, K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The origin and goal of history]. Moscow, Respublika. 527 p. Pp. 420–508. (In Russ.).
Jaspers, K. (2007) Velikie filosofy. Budda, Konfutsii, Lao-tszy, Nagardzhuna [The great philosophers. Buddha, Confucius, Lao Tzu, Nagarjuna]. Moscow, Institute of Philosophy, RAS. 303 p. (In Russ.).
Published
How to Cite
фии // Новые исследования Тувы. 2021. № 2. С. 92-99. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2021.2.8
For citation:
Nizhnikov S. A. and Vorobiev V. V. Problema statusa «ia» kak antropologicheskoi kategorii v buddiiskoi filosofii [The
Problem of the Status of “Self” as an Anthropological Category in Buddhist Philosophy]. New Research of Tuva, 2021, no. 2, pp. 92-99. (In Russ.). DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2021.2.8
Issue
Section
Author Biographies
Sergei A. Nizhnikov, B. B. Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University; Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Doctor of Philosophy, Visiting Researcher, B. B. Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University; Professor, Department of the History of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University).
Postal address: Office 111, 11 Pushkin St., 358000 Elista, Russian Federation; 10/2 Miklouho-Maclay St., 117198 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Tel.: +7 (495) 433-20-00.
E-mail: nizhnikov_sa@rudn.ru
Valeriy V. Vorobiev, B. B. Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University
Post-graduate Student, Department of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, B. B. Gorodovikov Kalmyk State University.
Postal address: Office 111, 11 Pushkin St., 358000 Elista, Russian Federation.
Tel.: +7 (988) 685-71-54.
Эл. адрес: aristoteleus@yandex.ru
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.
