“Mongolophilia” of the political elite in the Tuvan People’s Republic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2020.3.3Keywords:
Tuvan People’s Republic; Tuvan history; USSR; Mongolia; Mongolian People’s Republic; Comintern; mongolophilia; mongolophil; political elite; Mongush Buian-Badyrgy; S. Oruigu; M. Nimazhap; Tuvans; Mongols; Khemchik rebellionAbstract
The article explores one aspect of the political history of Tuvan People’s Republic, which has not been covered by the researchers yet. The Soviet political discourse often referred to Tuvan politicians as ‘Mongolophilic’, meaning that they were sympathetic to the Mongolian People’s Republic or their commitment to align Tuva and Mongolia. The term was applied by the Soviets only to describe the political sentiments of the Tuvan elites (for instance, referring to the similar moods and orientation of the Buryat-Mongolian political elite and intelligentsia, they used a better-known term ‘pan-Mongolism’).
The aim of this article is to demonstrate what exactly the Soviet officials mean by ‘Mongolophilia’; who could be classified as a Mongolophile; what criteria were used for that and if these characteristics were true. The research is based on documents (reports, dispatches, characteristics, correspondence etc.), including those not published and stored in the Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History, f. 495 ‘Executive Committee of the Comintern’ (ECC).
Our analysis has shown that the terms ‘Mongolophilia’, ‘Mongolophiles’ and ‘Mongolophilic sentiment’ were used frequently in the Soviet and Comintern discourse of Tuva during the 1920s and the early 1930s. The terms were used most frequently to describe the Khemchik rebellion of 1924. Subsequently, the contacts between Tuvan politicians and Mongolian instructors or the Mongolian consulate in Tuva started to be seen by the Soviet officials as one of the criteria of ‘Mongolophilia’. A major presupposition was that ‘Mongolophilic’ sentiments of Tuvan politicians were based on the desire of allying with the nobility, lamas, feudal lords and all wealthy circles of MPR to contain the revolution in Tuva, and that ideologists of Tuvan “Mongolophilia” all came from among the wealthy Tuvan nobles.
References
Irgit, O. Yu. (2019) Politicheskie repressii v Tuvinskoi Narodnoi Respublike v 1921–1944 gg. [Political repressions in the Tuvan People's Republic in 1921–1944]: Diss. ... Candidate of Politic Sciences. Kyzyl. 213 p. (In Russ.).
Istoriia Tuvy [The History Of Tuva] (2007): in 3 vols. / ed. by V. A. Lamin. Novosibirsk, Nauka. Vol. 2. 430 p. (In Russ.).
Kabo, R. (1934) Ocherki istorii i ekonomiki Tuvy [Essays on the history and economy of Tuva]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gos. sots.-ekon. izd-vo. 203 p. (In Russ.).
Kaiskii, M. (2007) Uriankhaiskii vopros [The Uriankhai issue]. In: Uriankhai. Tyva depter: antologiia nauchnoi i prosvetitel'skoi mysli o drevnei tuvinskoi zemle i ee nasel'nikakh, ob Uriankhae — Tannu-Tuve, uriankhaitsakh – tuvintsakh, o drevnostiakh Tuvy [Uriankhai: The Tuva Notebook: An anthology of research and educational thought on the ancient land of Tuva and its population, on Uriankhai – Tannu-Tuva, Uriankhaians – Tuvan people, and on the antiquities of Tuva], in 7 vols. Comp. by S. K. Shoigu. Moscow, Slovo. Vol. 5: Uriankhaiskii krai: ot Uriankhaia k Tannu-Tuve [Uriankhai territory: from Uriankhai to Tannu-Tuva (late XIX — first half of XX century)]. 736 p. Pp. 552–563. (In Russ.).
Mollerov, N. M. (2005) Sovetsko-tuvinskie otnosheniia: 1917–1944 gg. [Soviet-Tuvan relations: 1917–1944]. Diss. … Doctor of History. Moscow. 465 p. (In Russ.).
Mollerov, N. M. (2015) Pozitsii SSSR i Vneshnei Mongolii po “uriankhaiskomu voprosu” v pervoi chetverti XX veka [The positions of the USSR and Outer Mongolia on the “Urikhay issue” in the first quarter of the 20th century]. In: Rossiia i Mongoliia v pervoi polovine XX veka: kontseptual'nye voprosy rossiisko-mongol'skikh otnoshenii (diplomatiia, ekonomika, nauka) [Russia and Mongolia in the first half of the 20th century: conceptual issues of Russian-Mongolian relations (diplomacy, economics, science)]. Ulan-Bator, Irkutsk, Izd-vo BGU. Book 5. 416 p. Pp. 221–230. (In Russ.).
Natsov, S. (1930) Pravaia opasnost’ v Tuvinskoi narodno-revoliutsionnoi partii [Right-wing threat in the Tuvan People's Revolutionary Party]. Zhizn’ Buriatii, no. 1, pp. 101–108. (In Russ.).
Otroshchenko, І. V. (2011) Na shlyakhu do Velykoyi Monholiyi (panmonhol’s’kyy rukh u 1920–1930-ti roky) [On the way to great Mongolia (pan-Mongolian movement in 1920s–1930s)]. Kyiv, Іnstitut skhodoznavstva іm. A. Yu. Krims'kogo. 456 p. (In Ukr.).
Otroshchenko, I. V. (2012) Iz istorii protestnogo dvizheniia v TNR pervoi poloviny 1930-kh gg. [About the history of protest movement in People’s Republic of Tuva in the first half of 1930s]. The New Research of Tuva, no. 3. [on-line] Available at: https://nit.tuva.asia/nit/article/view/315 (access date: 28.04.2020). (In Russ.).
Otroshchenko I. V. (2015) Iz istorii vzaimootnoshenii TNR i MNR: problema vozvrashcheniia “chasti tuvinskogo naroda”[From the history of People’s Republic of Tuva and People’s Republic of Mongolia mutual relations: the issue of returning “the part of Tuvan people”]. The New Research of Tuva, no. 3, pp. 27–40 [on-line] Available at: https://nit.tuva.asia/nit/article/view/4 (access date: 28.04.2020). (In Russ.).
Saaia, S. V. and Sat, S. Ch. (2006) Geopoliticheskii status Tuvy v pervoi polovine XX veka (1911–1944 gody) [Geopolitical status of Tuva in the first half of the twentieth century (1911–1944)]. Abakan, Khakass book publishing house. 293 p. (In Russ.).
Savitskii, P. N. (2003) Step' i osedlost' [Steppe and Settlement]. In: Klassika geopolitiki, XX vek [Classics of Geopolitics, XX Century]. Moscow, OOO “Izdatel'stvo AST”. 736 p. Pp. 688–699. (In Russ.).
Svodka svedenii voenno-statisticheskogo otdeleniia Shtaba Omskogo voennogo okruga o Zapadnom Kitae i Mongolii (Uliasutaiskii okrug, Kobdoskii okrug, Sin'tszian i Altaiskii okrug). Za pervuiu polovinu 1917 goda [A summary of the information of the military-statistical department of the Headquarters of the Omsk Military District on Western China and Mongolia (Ulyasutai District, Kobdo District, Xinjiang and Altai District). For the first half of 1917] (1917) Omsk, Tip. Shtaba Omsk. v. o. 73 p. (In Russ.).
Slovnik “Uriankhaisko-tuvinskoi entsiklopedii” [Vocabulary of the Uryankhay-Tuva Encyclopedia] (2019). TROO “Mir tuvintsev”. Kyzyl, s. n. 388 p. (In Russ.).
Sobranie arkhivnykh dokumentov o protektorate Rossii nad Uriankhaiskim kraem — Tuvoi: k 100-letiiu istoricheskogo sobytiia [A collection of archival documents on Russian protectorate over Uriankhai Krai — Tuva: the 100th anniversary of the historical event] (2014). Compl.: T. A. Bondarenko and al. Kyzyl, s. n. 479 p. (In Russ.).
Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, D. (2002/2003) Aziatskii soblazn Rossii [Russia’s Asian temptation]. Kosmopolis, no. 2, pp. 19–32. (In Russ.).
Tuvagiin tuukhend kholbogdokh arkhivyn barimdyn emkhetgel. Bot' III (1921–1944) = Sobranie arkhivnykh dokumentov po istorii Tuvy. Tom III (1921–1944) = Tyvanyn tooguzunge khamaarzhyr shygzhamyrlar bizhimelderinin chyyndyzy. Tom III (1921–1944) [A collection of archival documents on the history of Tuva. Vol. 3 (1921–1944] (2014) / ed. by S. Chuluun and A. K. Bicheldei. Ulanbaatar; Kyzyl, s. n. 418 p. (In Mong., Russ. and Tuv.).
Khertek, L. K. (2016) Tuvinsko-mongol'skie sviazi i otnosheniia v period Tuvinskoi Narodnoi Respubliki [Tuvan-Mongolian relations and links under the People’s Republic of Tuva]. The New Research of Tuva, no. 3, pp. 65–81 [on-line] Available at: http://nit.tuva.asia/nit/article/view/464 (access date: 28.04.2020). (In Russ.).
Khovalyg, S. (2007) Lichnost' v istorii: Mongush Buian-Badyrgy (1892–1932) [A person in history: Mongush Buyan-Badyrgy (1892–1932)]. Vestnik Evrazii, no. 2 (36), pp. 42–71. (In Russ.).
Khoruzhii, S. (2008) Russkii filosof v Litve: a case study [Russian philosopher in Lithuania: a case study]. Russkii Mir", no. 1, pp.186–199. (In Russ.).
Shurkhuu, D. (2001) Uriankhaiskii vopros v mongolo-rossiiskikh otnosheniiakh v pervoi chetverti XX veka [Uryanhay issue in Mongolian-Russian relations in the first quarter of the twentieth century]. In: Rossiia i Mongoliia: novyi vzgliad na istoriiu vzaimootnoshenii v XX veke [Russia and Mongolia: a new look at the history of relations in the XX century]. Editor: Altantsetseg N. et al. Moscow, IV RAN. 276 p. Pp. 97–117. (In Russ.).
Bebler, A. (1987) Conflicts between Socialist States. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 31–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338702400104
Friters, Gerard M. (1937) The Development of Outer Mongolian Independence. Pacific Affairs, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 315–336. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.2307/2751345
Mänchen-Helfen, O. (1931) Reise ins Asiatische Tuwa. Berlin, Der Bücherkreis g.m.b.h. 172 p. (In Germ).
Shurkhuu, D. (2014) Similarities and Differences between Mongolia and Tuva in the Evolution of Bilateral Ties. In: Oirat People: Cultural Uniformity and Diversification / Ed. by I. Lkhagvasuren and Yuki Konagaya. Osaka, Senri Ethnological Studies (SES). Pp. 127–144. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15021/00002408
Tang, P. S. H. (1959) Russian and Soviet Policy in Manchuria and Outer Mongolia. 1911–1931. Durham, N. C., Duke University Press. xx, 494 p.
Published
How to Cite
For citation:
Otroshchenko I. V. “Mongolofil'stvo” politicheskoi elity Tuvinskoi Narodnoi Respubliki [“Mongolophilia” of the political elite in the Tuvan People’s Republic]. New Research of Tuva, 2020, no. 3, pp. 35–48. (In Russ.). DOI: www.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2020.3.3
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.
