Удаленная малая экономика: теоретические основания и эмпирические наблюдения

Larisa V. Melnikova

doi:10.25178/nit.2019.3.8

Authors

Larisa V. Melnikova Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7427-7289

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2019.3.8

Keywords:

remoteness; size of economy; transportation costs; regional policy; Altay; Tuva; Buryatia; Khakassia; small economy; economy of scale; regional economy

Abstract

Since the 1990s the subject of the influence of the geographical factor on the economic dynamics and, hence, inter-country and inter-regional inequality attracts close attention in the economic literature. The problems of isolated remote regions within a country are relevant for countries distinguished by their size of territory and diversity of natural conditions, such as Russia, Canada, Australia, and the USA. Research in the field of “economics of isolation and remoteness” carried out on the basis of national economies of the world resulted in the creation of concepts and approaches that are applicable to the level of the region, to the extent that the region can be considered as analogous to the national economy. The article is devoted to the analysis of theoretical substantiations of the effects of remoteness and the results of their empirical tests. The effects discussed are illustrated by the example of 4 remote republics: Altai, Tuva, Buryatia and Khakassia.

An overview of the discussion on the topic “Death of distance” has demonstrated that the role of distance in shaping the spatial structure of economy does not decrease despite of the development of transportation and telecommunication technologies. The microeconomic analysis reveals that a firm behavior in the course of choosing its location is based by the interaction between transportation costs and the type of economies of scale. At the macroeconomic level these 2 factors define how the parameters of remoteness and of the size of national or regional economy affect the indicators of production and welfare. Depending on the ratio of the 2 parameters, multidirectional effects are possible: generally, the remoteness of reduces production efficiency, decreases competition and complicates the spread of innovation, while the growing size of local market may reap economies of scale in production. For these reasons, remote regions are distinguished by their specific sectoral structure of economy that is characterized by a small number of specialization sectors and hypertrophied proportion of public sector due to the difficulties in delivering public goods.

Basic recommendations in the field of regional policy aimed to overcome the isolation of remote regions come down to promoting infrastructural development, supporting local demand and developing human capital, but potential positive influence of such policies is restricted by structural specifics of local economies while long-term impacts of enhancing transport accessibility weaken protective effects of remoteness.

References

Dabiev D. F. (2018) Professional'nye predpochtenia naselenia Tuvy v kontekste ekonomicheskoi kul'tury [Career preferences of Tuva population in the context of economic culture]. The New Research of Tuva], no. 2, pp. 132-148. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.25178/nit.2018.2.7

Mel’nikova, L. V. (2015) Sovremennaia regional'naia ekonomika: teorii i modeli [Modern regional economies: Theories and models]. Novosibirsk, NSU Publ. (In Russ.)

Mel’nikova, L. V. (2018) Teoreticheskie argumenty i jempiricheskoe znanie v strategicheskom planirovanii [Theoretical arguments and empirical evidence in strategic planning]. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologia [Region: Economics and Sociology], vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 52-81. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15372/REG20180203

Ricardo, D. (1955) Nachala politicheskoi ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniia. [On the principles of political economy and taxation] Sochineniia [Works]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoi literaturi. Vol. I. 860 p. (In Russ.)

Smith, A. (2019 (1776)) Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov [An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations]. Moscow, Jeksmo Publ. (In Russ.)

Alasia, A., Bédard, F., Bélanger, J., Guimond, E. and Penney, Ch. (2017) Measuring remoteness and accessibility: A set of indices for Canadian communitiess (Reports on Special Business Projects No. 18- 001–X), Statistics Canada. [online] Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/18-001-x/18-001-x2017002-eng.htm (access date: 20.05.2019)

Ashraf, Q., Galor, O. and Ozak, O. (2010) Isolation and Development. Journal of the European Economic Association, April‐May, vol. 8, no. 2-3, pp. 401-412. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00511.x

Battersby, B. (2006) Does distance matter? The effect of geographic isolation on productivity levels. OECD Economic Studies, no. 42, pp. 205-225. [online] Available at http://www.oecd.org/australia/38698291.pdf (access date: 10.05.2019)

Blainey, G. (2001) The tyranny of distance: how distance shaped Australia's history. Sydney, Macmillan. 413 p.

Busse, M. (2003) Tariffs, transport costs and the WTO Doha Round: The case of developing countries. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15-31 [online] Available at https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ecjilt/23818.html (access date: 13.05.2019).

Cairncross, F. (1997) The death of distance: how the communications revolution is changing our lives. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press. 302 p.

Cairns, R. D. (1998) The microeconomics of mineral extraction under capacity constraints. Nonrenewable Resources, September, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 233-244. DOI: 10.1007/BF02767673

Disdier, A.-C. and Head, K. (2008) The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 37-48. DOI: 10.1162/rest.90.1.37

Friedman, T. L. (2005) The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 488 p.

Hägerstrand, T. (1967) Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

MacKellar, L., Wörgötter, A. and Wörz, J. (2000) Economic growth of landlocked countries. Reihe Transformationsökonomie / Transition Economics Series, no. 14, Institute for Advanced Studies. [online] Available at https://ideas.repec.org/p/ihs/ihstep/14.html (access date: 11.05.2019).

McCann, P. (2009) Economic geography, globalisation and New Zealand's productivity paradox. New Zealand Economic Paper, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 279-314. DOI: 10.1080/00779950903308794

McCann, P. and Shefer, D. (2003) Location, agglomeration and infrastructure. Papers in Regional Science, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 177-196. DOI: 10.1007/s10110-003-0182-y

Nijkamp, P. (2017) The death of distance. In: B. S. Frey and D. Iselin, eds. Economic ideas you should forget. Cham, Springer International Publishing, pp. 93-94. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47458-8

Redding, S. and Venables, A. J. (2002) The economics of isolation and distance. Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 28, pp. 93-108. [Online] Available at: http://www.nopecjournal.org/NOPEC_2002_a07.pdf. (access date: 21.05.2019).