The sub-ethnic aspects of the Buryats: the issues of ethnic self-identification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2017.1.8Keywords:
Buryat; clan and tribal identification; sub-ethnic groups; ethnic identity; identificationAbstract
The article describes the ethnic self-consciousness of Buryats in contemporary Russia, with a focus on sub-ethnic identification. Thus the issue of sub-ethnicity is seen through the prism of identification and linked to the clan and tribal structure of an ethnicity.
The complex tribal structure of the Buryats includes a multitude of entities, the largest of which are the Ekhirid, the Bulagad, the Khondogor and the Khori. All of them are descendants of proto-Buryat tribes who lived in the Baikal region in the Middle Ages. It is with these groups that many contemporary Buryats identify themselves.
A brief look at the history of Buryat tribes shows that they began as strictly exogamic communities, as large patriarchal families. The arrival of Russian settlers in the Baikal region in the 17th century led to a rearrangement of the borders of the tribes’ traditional territories. At the turn of the 19th century, land was divided along the territorial borders of the ulus, rather than viewed as belonging to a particular clan. Thus, clan structure no longer directly matched territorial communities. In the 19th century clans begin functioning as administrative units. Tribal divisions survived, but tribes split into smaller groups which recruited representatives of other nomadic clans passing through the territory associated with a tribe. In early 20th century the administrative role of clan communities collapsed. The policy aimed at the construction of a Socialist Buryat nation, aided by the official control of migration in the USSR, created a specific ethnic community within the Buryat-Mongol Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. The clan and tribal structure in the Soviet years lost its historical functions, but survived in the memories and self-identification of the Buryats. The 1990s saw its renaissance in the general conditions of national revival – including the re-actualization of clans and tribes as identities.
The existence of Buryats’ sub-ethnic identification with a clan and a tribe does not prevent them from belonging to a unified Buryat ethnicity or a federal-level Russian civil identity. The identification with a clan in Buryatia is relevant, since a number of functions are assigned to it. Therefore, in the foreseeable future it will survive as a specific feature of the Buryat ethnicity.
References
Amogolonova, D. D., Elaeva, I. E. and Skrynnikova, T. D. (2005) Buriatskaia etnichnost' v kontekste sotsiokul'turnoi modernizatsii (postsovetskii period). Irkutsk, RPTs «Radian». 246 p. (In Russ.)
Antonov, V. I. and Ochirova, O. A. (2003) Sovremennye buriaty kak etnosotsial'naia obshchnost': nekotorye osobennosti identifikatsionnogo protsessa. In: Kul'tura i mentalitet naseleniia Sibiri: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, ed. A.O. Boronoev. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo SPbGU. (In Russ.)
Arutiunov, S. A. (1989) Fantom bezetnichnosti. In: Rasy i narody : Sovremennye etnicheskie i rasovye problemy: Ezhegodnik, ed. S. I. Bruk. Vol. 19. Moscow, Nauka. Pp. 22–24. (In Russ.)
Asalkhanov, I. A. (1963) Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe razvitie Vostochnoi Sibiri vo vtoroi polovine XIX v. Ulan-Ude, Buriat. kn. izd-vo. 493 p. (In Russ.)
Baldaev, S. P. (1961) Materialy k izucheniiu rodovykh i plemennykh otnoshenii u buriat. In: Baldaev S. P. Izbrannoe. Ulan-Ude, Buriat. kn. izd-vo. 255 p. Pp. 77–109. (In Russ.)
Baldaev, S. P. (1970) Rodoslovnye predaniia i legendy buriat. Ch.1. Bulagaty i ekhirity. Ulan-Ude, 1970. 362 s. Irkipediia. Entsiklopediia i novosti Priangar'ia [online] Available at: http://irkipedia.ru/sites/default/files/pdf/automat/baldaev-predanija-buryat.pdf (access date: 12.01.2017). (In Russ.)
Buriaty (2004), ed. L. L. Abaeva and N. L. Zhukovskaia. Moscow, Nauka. 633 p. (In Russ.)
Golovnev, A. V. (2015) Fenomen kolonizatsii. Ekaterinburg, UrO RAN. 592 p. (In Russ.)
Dagbaev, E. D. (2010) Buriatskaia etnicheskaia identichnost': mezhdu traditsiei i modernizatsiei. Vestnik Buriatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 6, pp. 134–141. (In Russ.)
Dorzhiev, B. Sh. (2005) Iz istorii buriatskikh rodoplemennykh obrazovanii Pribaikal'ia. In: Aktual'nye problemy istorii i kul'tury narodov aziatsko-tikhookeanskogo regiona: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., g. Ulan-Ude, 26 aprelia 2005 g., ed. B. V. Bazarov. UlanUde, Izd.poligraf. kompleks FGOU VPO VSGAKI. Pp. 396–404. (In Russ.)
Zhukovskaia, N. L. (2002) Kochevniki Mongolii: Kul'tura. Traditsii. Simvolika. Moscow, Vostochnaia literatura. 274 p. (In Russ.)
Istoriia Ust'-Ordynskogo Buriatskogo avtonomnogo okruga (1995), ed. L. M. Dameshek. Moscow, Progress. 544 p. (In Russ.)
Karlov, V. V. (2016) Etnosy i globalizatsiia: unifikatsiia ili rost mnogoobraziia kul'tur? In: Etnokul'turnoe vosproizvodstvo v usloviiakh globalizatsii: etnoperekrestki i transgranich'e: kollektivnaia monografiia po materialam XI Kongressa antropologov i etnologov Rossii, 2–5 iiulia 2015 goda, ed. V. V. Karlov and E. A. Okladnikova. Moscow, Berlin, Direkt-Media. 316 p. Pp. 5–30. (In Russ.)
Kradin N. N. (2014) Transformatsiia skotovodcheskogo khoziaistva u aginskikh buriat v nachale XXI veka: sravnitel'nyi analiz. Vestnik Rossiiskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda, no. 3 (76), pp. 205–214. (In Russ.)
Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2013) Arkhaizatsiia obshchestva: Tuvinskii fenomen. Moscow, Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM». 272 p. (In Russ.)
Munkozhargalov, B. E. (2015) Poka my sporim o dialktakh, iazyk umiraet. Novaia Buriatiia, 25 June. [online] Available at: http://www.newbur.ru/articles/21574 (access date: 12.01.2017). (In Russ.)
Pavlinskaia, L. R. (1996) Eshche raz ob etnicheskoi istorii baikal'skogo regiona. In: Sibir': drevnie etnosy i ikh kul'tury, ed. L. R. Pavlinskaia. St. Petersburg, MAE RAN. 198 p. Pp. 62–96. (In Russ.)
Petri, B. E. (1924) Elementy rodovoi sviazi u severnykh buriat. Irkutsk, Vost.-Sib. Otd. Rus. Geogr. O-va. (In Russ.)
Popkov, Iu. V. (2016) Ethnosocial processes in Siberia: Topical issues of theory and practice. The New Research of Tuva, no. 2 [online] Available at: https://nit.tuva.asia/nit/article/view/92 (access date: 12.01.2017). (In Russ.).
Stroganova, E. A. (2001) Buriatskoe natsional'no-kul'turnoe vozrozhdenie (konets 80-kh — seredina 90-kh godov XX veka, Respublika Buriatiia). Moscow, Irkutsk, Natalis. 150 p. (In Russ.)
Tendriakova, M. V. (2008) Tengrianstvo: ot gosudarstvennoi religii k zabytym kul'tam. In: Religiia v istorii i kul'ture mongoloiazychnykh narodov Rossii, comp., ed. N. L. Zhukovskaia. Moscow, Vostochnaia literatura. 319 p. Pp. 133–158. (In Russ.)
Tregubova, D. D. (2009) Mesto i rol' rodoplemennoi identifikatsii v soznanii sovremennykh buriat. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, issue 8, Istoriia, no. 1, pp. 77–82. (In Russ.)
Tregubova D. D. (2011) Subetnicheskie gruppy buriat v proshlom i nastoiashchem : Diss. … Candidate of History. Moscow. 180 p. (In Russ.)
Uvarova, T. B. (2015) Sovremennye formy prezentatsii etnicheskoi identichnosti korennykh malochislennykh narodov Severa. In: XI Kongress antropologov i etnologov Rossii: sb. materialov (Ekaterinburg, 2–5 iiulia 2015 g.), ed. V. A. Tishkov and A. V. Golovnev. Moscow, Ekaterinburg, IEA RAN, IIiAUrO RAN. 504 p. Pp. 216–217. (In Russ.)
Uvarova T. B. (2016) Etnicheskaia identichnost' v sisteme zhiznennykh tsennostei korennykh malochislennykh narodov Severa i Sibiri. In: Etnokul'turnoe vosproizvodstvo v usloviiakh globalizatsii: etnoperekrestki i transgranich'e: kollektivnaia monografiia po materialam XI Kongressa antropologov i etnologov Rossii, 2–5 iiulia 2015 goda, ed. V. V. Karlov and E. A. Okladnikova. Moscow, Berlin, Direkt-Media. 316 p. Pp. 296–315. (In Russ.)
Umbetalieva, T. B. (2003) Traibalizm v Kazakhstane. Rodoplemennaia differentsiatsiia — osnova politicheskoi sistemy. TsentrAziia, 3 January [online] Available at: http://www.centrasia.ru/newsA.php?st=1041591120 (access date: 12.01.2017). (In Russ.).
«Ustav ob inorodtsakh» M. M. Speranskogo i zemel'naia politika Rossiiskoi imperii v Sibiri XVII—XX vv. (1994). In: Zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiiskoi imperii: Sb. Dokumentov, comp. F. A. Satlaev. Gorno-Altaisk, Ak-Chechek. 74 p. (In Russ.)
Huntington, S. (2003) Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii, transl. by Engl. by T. Velimeeva. Iu. Novikova. Moscow, OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST». 603, [5] p. (In Russ.)
Mongol ulamzhlalt akhui am'dralyn tovch tol' (khөkhzul) (1992). Ulaanbaatar khot: «EsөnErdene» khevleliin khorshoo. (In Mong.)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.