Buddhist idea of ‘upaya-prajnya’ in the context of development strategy of modern society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2025.1.16Keywords:
Buddhism; global problem; globalization; principle of complementarity; intercultural philosophy; Buddhist world; Buddhist strategy; upaya-prajna; method-wisdomAbstract
The article evaluates the effectiveness of the ‘upaya-prajna’ concept, one of the fundamental categories of the Tantric Buddhist tradition, as a strategy for the spiritual development of modern society. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to develop strategies that prioritize universal human interests and the awareness of the world's integrity in the spirit of “new humanism”. The methodology of intercultural philosophy makes it possible to turn to Buddhist culture as a source of alternative strategies.
It has been established that the essence of the ‘upaya-prajna’ concept lies in the union of method (bodhicitta) and wisdom (the realization of shunyata). In the Tibetan tradition, ‘upaya-prajna’ is embodied in the tantric practice of the All-Encompassing Yoga.
In relation to the strategy for social development, the concept of ‘upaya-prajna’ can be interpreted as the unity of the ethical (method) and the rational (wisdom). It is noted that the principles of rationality and ethics can and should be complementary elements, which aligns with N. Bohr’s principle of complementarity. This principle can be interpreted as the existence of a specific complementarity between rationality and morality, reason and heart, wisdom and compassion.
The article presents the opinions of leaders of Buddhist organizations from Tibet, Bhutan, and Russia, affiliated with the Tibetan tradition, whose interviews were conducted in 2023. The interview materials revealed that they propose a balanced combination of method and wisdom as a solution to global challenges facing humanity.
References
Abaev, N. V. and Feldman, V. R. (2016) Buddhism in the context of global challenges and the crisis of modern civilization. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya Vnutrenney Azii, no. 3, pp. 3–9. (In Russ.)
Abaeva, L. L. (2020) Strategies and Trends of Buddhist Denomination in Mono- and Multi-Ethnic Communities of the Mongolian World. Vlast, no. 28(6), pp. 182–187. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i6.7775
Guseinov, A. A. (2014) Philosophy as an ethical project. Voprosy filosofii, no. 5, pp. 16–26. (In Russ.)
Kasavin, I. T. (2019) Science as an ethical project. Voprosy filosofii, no. 11, pp. 90–103. (In Russ.)
Conze, E. (2003) Buddhism: Its essence and development. Transl. from English by I. Belyaev. St. Petersburg, Nauka. 288 p. (In Russ.)
Korobov, V. B. (2024) Abhidharma as a Strategy of Cognition. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya, no. 28(1), pp. 47–56. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-1-47-56
Malkina, S. M. (2015) Strategies of philosophical thinking in deconstruction and Madhyamaka-Prasangika. Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriya i sovremennost', no. 2, pp. 70–78. (In Russ.)
Nasonov, A. A. (2016) Missionary strategies of Orthodox and Buddhist adherents in the south of Western Siberia (late 19th–early 20th centuries) and features of interfaith interaction. Nauchnyy dialog, no. 3(51), pp. 233–244. (In Russ.)
Ostrovskaya, E. A. and Badmatsyrenov, T. B. (2022) Russian Digital Buddhism: Strategies of Buddhist Communities in New Media. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 7, pp. 109–119. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250019277-7
Petinenko, I.A. (2003) Rational and ethical aspects of pricing behavior of Russian firms in modern conditions. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 279, pp. 109–115. (In Russ.)
Rauschenbach, B. V. (1991) Religion and morality. Znamya, no. 1, pp. 204–216. (In Russ.)
Stepanyants, M. T. (2020) Intercultural philosophy: Origins, methodology, issues, perspectives. Moscow, Nauka, Vostochnaya literatura. 183 p. (In Russ.)
Tucci, G. (2005) Religions of Tibet. St. Petersburg, Evraziya. 415 p. (In Russ.)
Ulanov, M. S. and Badmaev, V. N. (2023) The phenomenon of socially engaged Buddhism in the contemporary world. New Research of Tuva, no. 3, pp. 138–150. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2023.3.9
Ulanov, M. S., Badmaev, V. N. and Khomutnikov, V. Kh. (2024) Ecological ethics in Buddhism: Traditions and modern experience. New Research of Tuva, no. 1, pp. 247–264. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2024.1.16
Erenzhenova, Yu. Yu. (2022) Categories of Tibetan Buddhist culture in the religious tradition of the Kalmyks. Elista, Publishing house of Kalmyk University. 179 p. (In Russ.)
Erenzhenova, Yu. Yu. (2023) The expediency of discussions between scientists and Buddhists in the context of searching for solutions to global problems. Vek globalizatsii, no. 4(48), pp. 116–127. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2023.04.09
Yaskevich, Ya. S. (2017) Rationality, morality, and governance models in business and politics. Vek globalizatsii, no. 3(23), pp. 130–142. (In Russ.)
Baker, C. (2021) Buddhism and effective altruism. In: Effective Altruism and Religion: Synergies, Tensions, Dialogue. Ed. by S. Riedener, D. Roser and M. Huppenbauer. Baden-Baden, Nomos. 254 p. Pp. 17–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748925361-17
Green, R. S. (2016) Buddhist Responses to Globalization, Edited by Leah Kalmanson and James Mark Shields. Journal of Global Buddhism, no. 17 (May), pp. 32–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1305872.
Huang, Zhi, and Wei, Li (2024) Strategic Use of Karma in Lan Cao’s Monkey Bridge. Religions, no. 15 (404), pp. 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040404
Kozhevnikova, M. (2019) Enhancing Human Cognition Through Vajrayana Practices. Journal of Religion and Health, no. 58, pp. 737–747.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00776-z
Philosophical Aspects of Globalization: A Multidisciplinary Inquiry (2022). Ed. by A. N. Chumakov, A. DeBlasio, I. V. Ilyin. Leiden; Boston, Brill. 447 p.
Rocha, C. (2012) Buddhism and Globalization. In: Buddhism in the Modern World / ed. by D. McMahan. New York, Routledge. 352 p. Pp. 289–303.
Shinde, K. A. (2022) How Effective Is a Buddhist Pilgrimage Circuit as a Product and Strategy for Heritage Tourism in India? Heritage, no. 5, pp. 3846–3863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5040198
Published
How to Cite
For citation:
Erendzhenova Yu. Yu., Badmaev V. N. and Ulanov M. S. Buddhist idea of ‘upaya-prajnya’ in the context of development strategy of modern society. New Research of Tuva, 2025. no. 1, pp. 212-223. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2025.1.16
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.