Visual representations in the novels of Amirkhan Yeniki and Oleg Sagan-ool

Authors

  • Alexey A. Arzamazov Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; RUDN University
  • Angela V. Dolzhikova RUDN University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2024.4.6

Keywords:

visual phenomenon; Tatar literature; Tuvan literature; novel genre; literary image; landscape; visualization; ethnoculture; Amirkhan Yeniki; Oleg Sagan-ool

Abstract

The article discusses the representation of visuality in the texts of two Turkic literary works — Tatar and Tuvan literature. The sources used for this analysis are the novels “Gulandam” (1977) and “The Expendables” by Oleg Sagan-ool, which were translated into Russian.

The artistic representation of vision reflects the objective and subjective psychological and physiological abilities of an individual, as well as the unique nature of creative self-expression. It also explores the diverse ethnocultural contexts and interactions between different forms of art.

During the analysis, several visual components were identified (portraits of characters, natural landscapes, figurative associations, comparisons, “spaces” of memory, dreams in visual form). Some stadial-typical, ethnospecific and individual-authorial features of the visual representation were recorded. Eniki's novel focuses on the portrayal of representatives of the new Soviet Tatar intelligentsia and touches on the relationship between music and visual arts. O. Sagan-ool describes the rural life of the Tuvan people in the context of the first collective farms, emphasizing the external features of his characters. He consistently reveals the ethnocultural element and shows the difficulties of interpersonal communication through his versatile descriptions.

The question arises about the development of criteria for identifying visual parameters in a literary text and the system of literature.

References

Literature visualization (2012) / ed. and comp. by K. Ichin and Ia. Voivodich. Belgrad, Publishing House of the Faculty of Philology. 349 p. (In Russ.).

Visual attractors in literature: materials of the round table (2017). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 4 (146), pp. 81–120. (In Russ.).

Geller, L. (1997) On the approaches to the genre of ecphrasis. Russian background for non-Russian paintings (and vice versa). Wiener Slawistisher Almanach, Bd. 44, pp. 151–171. (In Russ.).

Dimeshi, Zh. (2004) The place of pictorial and graphic images in the composition of A. Platonov's novel “Happy Moscow”. In: Studia Russica XXI: Literature and visual art / ed. by A. Khan and Zh. Kheteni. Budapest, Budapeshtskii universitet im. L. Etvesha. 436 p. Pp. 9–20. (In Russ.).

Evgrafova, Yu. A. (2022) Hypotyposis in heterogeneous screen texts on the example of ASMR video. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriia: Teoriia iazyka. Semiotika. Semantika, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 353–363. (In Russ.).

Esaulov, I. A. (2002) Ecphrasis in Modern Russian Literature: Painting and Icon. In: Ecphrasis in Russian literature. Proceedings of the Lausanne Symposium / ed. by L. Geller. Moscow, MIK Publ. 215 p. Pp. 167–179. (In Russ.).

Zhenett, Zh. (1998) Figures : in 2 vol. Moscow, Izd.-vo im. Sabashnikovykh. 472 + 472 pp. (In Russ.).

Zakirova, R. R. and Gabdrakhmanova, F. Kh. (2017) Etymological characteristics of the Tatar lexeme “Mon” (sadness, melody). Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy i praktiki, no. 3 (69), pp. 82–84. (In Russ.).

Zamaletdinov, R. R., Gabdrakhmanova, F. Kh. and Zakirova, R. R. (2016) Linguistic consciousness of native Tatar linguoculture (according to the data of a free associative experiment). Kazan', Otechestvo. 172 p. (In Russ.).

Zvereva, T. V. (2017) “Where the flying moments are prolonged”: pictorial aspects of Russian literature. Izhevsk, Udmurtskii University Publ. 172 p. (In Russ.).

Zenkin, S. N. (2023) Imago in fabula. The intradiegetic image in literature and cinema. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 624 p. (In Russ.).

Zlydneva, N. V. (2008) Image and word in the rhetoric of Russian culture of the twentieth century. Moscow, Indrik. 304 p. (In Russ.).

Kombu, S. S. (2012) Tuvan literature : a dictionary / ed. by D. A. Mongush and M. L. Trifonova. Novosibirsk, Nauka. 359 p. (In Russ.).

Mednis, N. E. (2006) “Religious ecphrasis” in Russian literature. Kritika i semiotika, no. 10, pp. 58–67. (In Russ.).

“Inexpressibly Expressible”: Ecphrasis and problems of visual representation in a literary text (2013) / comp. and ed. by D. V. Tokarev. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 572 p. (In Russ.).

Stakhorskii, S. (2019) Narratives of theatrical drama and their screen reflections (diegesis and ecphrasis). Voprosy teatra. Proscaenium, no. 3/4, pp. 412–435. (In Russ.).

Theory and history of ecphrasis: Results and prospects of the study (2018) / ed. by T. Avtukhovich. Siedlce, ELPIL. 703 p. (In Russ.).

Khadakhane, M. A. (1968) Tuvan prose / ed. by Z. S. Kedrina. Kyzyl, Tuvknigoizdat. 131 p. (In Russ.).

Shatin, Yu. V. (2004) Revived paintings: ecphrasis and diegesis. Kritika i semiotika, no. 7, pp. 217–226. (In Russ.).

Yatsenko, E. V. (2011) “Love painting, poets...”: Ecphrasis as an artistic and ideological model. Voprosy filosofii, no. 11, pp. 47–57. (In Russ.).

Méchoulan, É. (2003) Intermédialités : histoire et théorie des arts, des lettres et des techniques / Intermediality: History and Theory of the Arts, des lettres et des techniques. Intermédialités, no. 1, pp. 9–27.

Robillard, V. (1998) In Pursuit of Ekphrasis (An intertextual Approach). In: Pictures into Words. Theoretical and Descriptive Approaches to Ekphrasis. Ed. by V. Robillard, E. Jongeneel. Amsterdam, VU University Press. 225 р. Pp. 53–72.

Published

29.11.2024

How to Cite

Арзамазов А. А., Должикова А. В. Репрезентация визуального в романах Амирхана Еники и Олега Саган-оола // Новые исследования Тувы. 2024, № 4. С. 76-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2024.4.6

For citation:
Arzamazov A. A. and Dolzhikova A. V. Visual representations in the novels of Amirkhan Yeniki and Oleg Sagan-ool. New Research of Tuva, 2024, no. 4, pp.  76-91. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2024.4.6

Issue

Section

Special theme

Author Biographies

Alexey A. Arzamazov, Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences; RUDN University

Doctor of Philology, Head, Laboratory of Multifactor Humanitarian Analysis and Cognitive Philology, Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences;

Professor, Department of Russian Studies, Ethnocentric Pedagogy and Digital Didactics, RUDN University.

Postal addresses: 2/31 Lobachevskogo St., 420111, Russian Federation, Kazan; building 3, 10, Miklouho-Maklaya St., 3117198, Russian Federation, Moscow.

Email: arzami@rambler.ru

Angela V. Dolzhikova, RUDN University

Candidate of Chemical Sciences, Director, Russian Language Institute, RUDN University; member, Russian Language Council under the President of the Russian Federation, vice-president, Russian Society of Teachers of Russian Language and Literature, leading expert, Russkiy Mir Foundation.

Postal address: 3/10, Miklukho-Maklay St., 117198, Moscow, Russia.

Email: dolzhikova_av@pfur.ru