“Soil” in ethnicity: Traditions of Russian ethnology tested by “perestroika” and postmodernism (problem statement)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2023.1.8Keywords:
ethnos; people; ethnicity; ethnic culture; ethnography; ethnology; ethnic studies; soil; Russia; Tuva; Tuvan culture; TuvansAbstract
The author analyzes the ambiguity of the Russian discourse of ethnicity. It has become an overarching topic in anthropology and ethnography (ethnology). This ambiguity is stemming from transformations in the country’s social system and social and humanities knowledge, including ethnography/ethnology (ethnic studies). Therefore, in the article the consideration of the epistemological and ontological aspects of the topic of “soil”, as it is presented in ethnicity, is preceded by an analysis of the drastic changes of methodological objectives and challenges of the national study of peoples (ethnoses) in the post-Soviet period.
The author comes to the conclusion that, by and large, there is no “soil” in ethnicity. The latter is understood within the framework of the constructivist methodological setting and reduced to ethnic identity. In fact, identity here has no ontological foundations and therefore no real ground.
This issue is adequately reflected in Russian ethnology in its classical sense. According to A. V. Golovnev, initially it is a “soil” science, it means that it is based on the study of “real circumstances and needs” of peoples. A solution of this problem in relation to our time is possible with the use of modern research methods. It is necessary to take into account not only options of an external view on ethnic culture (outside), but also characteristics of its internal state (inside) in the culture bearers’ representations. In this context, interesting studies are conducted within the framework of Tuvinology. The author draws attention to them.
The article suggests an idea about the need to develop the theory of ethnos taking into account the changed reality and applying modern research methods.
References
Arutiunov, S. A. (1989) Narody i kul'tury: razvitie i vzaimodeistvie [Peoples and cultures: Development and interaction]. Moscow, Nauka. 247 p. (In Russ.).
Bromlei, Yu. V. (2009) Ocherki teorii etnosa [Essays on the theory of ethnos]. 3rd ed., revised. Moscow, Librokom. 440 p. (In Russ.).
Golovnev, A. V. (2012) Etnichnost': ustoichivost' i izmenchivost' (opyt severa) [Ethnicity: Sustainability and changeability (the case of the North)]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 2, pp. 3–12. (In Russ.).
Golovnev, A. V. (2016) Etnokul'turnyi potentsial i polietnichnost' (rossiiskii rakurs) [Ethno-cultural potential and multi-ethnicity (Russian dimension)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriia, no. 4 (42), pp. 61–67. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/19988613/42/11
Golovnev, A. V. (2018) Etnografiia v rossiiskoi akademicheskoi traditsii [Ethnography in the Russian academic tradition]. Etnografiia, no. 1 (1), pp. 6–39. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31250/2618-8600-2018-1-6-39
Golovnev, A. V. (2021) Novaia etnografiia Severa [New ethnography of the North]. Etnografiia, no. 1 (11), pp. 6–24. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31250/2618-8600-2021-1(11)-6-24
Golovnev, A. V. (2022) Mnogonarodnost' Rossii: vzgliad s Severa [Multinationality of Russia: A view from the North]. Etnografiia, no. 4 (18), pp. 6–32. . (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31250/2618-8600-2022-4(18)-6-32
Golovnev, A. V., Belorussova, S. Yu. and Kisser, T. S. (2018) Veb-etnografiia i kiberetnichnost' [Web-ethnography and cyber-ethnicity]. Ural'skii istoricheskii vestnik, no. 1 (58), pp. 100–108. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2018-1(58)-100-108
Golovnev, A. V., Belorussova, S. Yu. and Kisser, T. S. (2021) Kiberetnografiia i virtual'naia etnichnost' [Cyberethnography and virtual ethnicity]. St. Petersburg, MAE RAN. 280 p. (In Russ.).
Dagylga: tuvinskie obriady osviashcheniia v XXI veke [Dagylga: Tuvan rites of consecration in the 21st century] (2021) / ed. by Ch. K. Lamazhaa and N. D. Suvandii. Kyzyl, s. n. 188 p. (In Russ. and Tuv.).
Ilyin, I. P. (1996) Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm [Poststructuralism. Deconstructivism. Postmodernism]. Moscow, Intrada. 256 p. (In Russ.).
Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2012) Tezaurusnyi podkhod v tuvinovedenii [The thesaurus approach for Tuvan studies]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 2, pp. 38–45. (In Russ.).
Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2021) Sotsial'naia kul'tura tuvintsev i onlain-prostranstvo [Social culture of Tuvans and online space]. New Research of Tuva, no. 2, pp. 115–129. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2021.2.10
Lamazhaa, Ch. K., Kuzhuget, Sh. Yu. and Mongush, A. V. (2022) Khoi e"di dlia tuvintsev. Identichnost', udobstvo, otvetstvennost' [Khoi edi for Tuvans. Identity, convenience, responsibility]. Etnografiia, no. 4 (18), pp. 151–174. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31250/2618-8600-2022-4(18)-151-174
Lukov, V. A. and Lukov, Vl. A. (2008) Tezaurusy: sub"ektnaia organizatsiia gumanitarnogo znaniia [Thesauri: The subjective organization of humanities knowledge]. Moscow, The National Institute of Business Publ. 784 p. (In Russ.).
Madyukova, S. A. (2022) Iavliaetsia li etnicheskaia kul'tura sotsial'nym institutom? [Is ethnic culture a social institution?]. Respublica Literaria, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 80–92. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.47850/RL.2022.3.2.80-92
Marx, K. (1974) Ekonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 goda [Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844]. In: Marx, K. and Engels, F. Sochineniia [Works]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Politicheskaia literatura. Vol. 42. 536 p. Pp. 41–174. (In Russ.).
Pain, E. A. (2022) O preodolenii nekotorykh stereotipov v rossiiskoi etnosotsiologicheskoi teorii [Overcoming some stereotypes in the Russian ethnosociological theory]. In: Etnosotsiologiia: poiski i sversheniia [Ethnosociology: Searches and achievements] / ed., comp. L. V. Ostapenko and I. A. Subbotina. Moscow, Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS. 482 p. Pp. 34–39. (In Russ.).
Popkov, Yu. V. (2020) Sovremennaia rossiiskaia natsional'naia politika: kontseptual'no-tselevye osnovy i opyt realizatsii (na primere Tuvy) [Contemporary Russian national policy: Conceptual and target bases and implementation experience (the case of Tuva)]. New Research of Tuva, no. 3, pp. 253–268. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2020.3.18
Popkov, Yu. V. (2021) «Etnologicheskaia modernizatsiia» v Rossii i ee proiavleniia v strategicheskikh orientirakh gosudarstvennoi natsional'noi politiki: paradigmal'nye osnovaniia i posledstviia [“Ethnological modernization” in Russia and its manifestations in the strategic guidelines of the state national policy: paradigmatic foundations and consequences]. In: Rossiia: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiia [Russia: Trends and prospects of development] : Yearbook : Proceedings of the 20th National conference with international participation / ed. V. I. Gerasimov. Moscow, Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences RAS. Issue 16, part 1. 1146 p. Pp. 226–228. (In Russ.).
Popkov, Yu. V. (2022) Retsenziia na knigu: Dagylga: tuvinskie obriady osviashcheniia v XXI veke / pod red. Ch. K. Lamazhaa, N. D. Suvandii. Kyzyl, 2021. 188 s. [Review of Lamazhaa, Ch. K., and Suvandii, N. D., eds. Dagylga: tuvinskie obriady osviashcheniia v XXI veke [Dagylga: Tuvan rites of consecration in the 21st century]. Kyzyl, 2021. 188 p.]. RUDN Journal of Russian History, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 300–304. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8674-2022-21-2-300-304
Popkov, Yu. V. and Tiugashev, E. A. (2020) Etnokul'turnyi neotraditsionalizm i identichnost' v sovremennykh sotsiokul'turnykh transformatsiiakh [Ethno-cultural neotraditionalism and identity in modern socio-cultural transformations]. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Technical University Publ. 256 p. (In Russ.).
Semenov, Yu. I. (2006) Toropit'sia s zaupokoinoi molitvoi po etnosu vriad li stoit (Ob osnovnykh ideiakh knigi V. A. Tishkova «Rekviem po etnosu. Issledovaniia po sotsial'no-kul'turnoi antropologii». M., 2004) [It’s hardly worth being in haste with a requiem for ethnos (On the basic ideas of V. A. Tishkov’s book ‘The Requiem for Ethnos. Researches on Social аnd Cultural Anthropology’. M., 2004)]. Filosofiia i obshchestvo, issue 2 (43), pp. 94–106. (In Russ.).
Tishkov, V. A. (2003) Rekviem po etnosu: issledovaniia po sotsial'no-kul'turnoi antropologii [Requiem for Ethnicity: Studies in social and cultural anthropology]. Moscow, Nauka. 544 p. (In Russ.).
Tishkov, V. A. (2016) Ot etnosa k etnichnosti i posle [From ethnos to ethnicity and after]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 5, pp. 5–22. (In Russ.).
Tishkov, V. A. (2020) Otkuda i kuda prishla rossiiskaia etnologiia: personal'nyi vzgliad v global'noi perspektive [From where is Russian ethnology and where is it going? A personal view in global perspective]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 2, pp. 72–137. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S086954150009606-6
Tuvintsy. Rodnye liudi [Tuvans. Native people] (2022) / Ch. K. Lamazhaa, N. D. Suvandii, Sh. Yu. Kuzhuget and Sh. B. Mainy ; ed. by Ch. K. Lamazhaa and N. D. Suvandii. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriia. 344 p. (In Russ.).
Tsivilizatsionnaia missiia Sibiri: ot tekhnogenno-potrebitel'skoi k dukhovno-ekologicheskoi strategii global'nogo i regional'nogo razvitiia [Civilizational mission of Siberia: From technogenic-consumer to spiritual-ecological strategy of global and regional development] (2022) / A. V. Ivanov, Yu. V. Popkov, I. V. Fotieva et al. ; ed. by A. V. Ivanov. Barnaul, Novyi format. 362 p. (In Russ.).
Shirokogorov, S. M. (1923) Etnos: Issledovanie osnovnykh printsipov izmeneniia etnicheskikh i etnograficheskikh iavlenii [Ethnos: A study of the basic principles of changing ethnic and ethnographic phenomena]. Shanghai, A separate impression from the LXVII Proceedings of the Oriental Faculty of the State Far Eastern University. 134 p. (In Russ.).
Etnologiia (etnografiia) [Ethnology (ethnography)] (2022) : A textbook / ed. by V. A. Kozmin and V. S. Buzin. Moscow, Urait. 438 p. (In Russ.).
Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2018) Indigenous methodology and research of Tuvan culture. Sibirica, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 68–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/sib.2018.170307
Published
How to Cite
For citation:
Popkov Yu. V. «Pochva» v etnichnosti: traditsii otechestvennogo narodovedeniia v ispytanii «perestroikoi» i postmodernizmom (postanovka problemy) [“Soil” in ethnicity: Traditions of Russian ethnology tested by “perestroika” and postmodernism (problem statement)]. New Research of Tuva, 2023, no. 1, pp. 137-153. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2023.1.8
Issue
Section
Author Biography
Yuri V. Popkov, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State Technical University
Doctor of Philosophy, Professor; Chief Research Fellow, Department of Social and Legal Studies, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences;
Professor, Department of International Relations and Regional Studies, Novosibirsk State Technical University.
Postal address: 8 Nikolaev St., 630090 Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Tel.: +7 (383) 330-22-40.
E-mail: yuripopkov54@mail.ru
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.
