Women in contemporary politics in the Republic of Tuva and the Republic of Kalmykia (based on a sociological study)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.4.17Keywords:
Republic of Tuva; Republic of Kalmykia; regional politics; woman in politics; gender imbalance; gender stereotype; political cultureAbstract
The aim of the research was to study gender differences in Russian regional policy in the cases of the republics of Tuva and Kalmykia. The data for the analysis consist of active rolls of the officials working in government agencies in the republics as well as the results of a sociological study conducted there in January — March 2022. The latter was pursued through in-depth and expert interviews and dealt with the issue of perception of women’s role and potential in regional politics and government. The expert interviewees comprised public and political figures of different times. We analyzed the existing gender stereotypes, assessments of women’s potential in regional politics as well as a comparison of men’s and women’s positions.
An analysis of the composition of the leadership staff of the legislative bodies of the two regions, the highest bodies of executive power, and ministries has found out that the number of active female politicians is quite small. Some regional features have been revealed: in Tuva, women are more represented in the parliament, while in Kalmykia, there are more women in the government of the region. Despite the high socioeconomic activity of women, a higher level of their education and, in general, their numerical predominance, patriarchal views on the role of females in politics and gender stereotypes are quite strong in both republics. According to these social biases, politics is a male sphere.
In addition to the gender stereotypes in the regions under consideration, there are strong economic and sociopsychological barriers to women. They prevent females from being more active in regional politics. A common feature of public opinion in the two republics is that many people are unprepared for the fact that women can hypothetically lead the regions. At the same time, the political potential of females is estimated to be higher in Kalmykia than in Tuva. This fact was confirmed when a woman was appointed the Chairman of the Government of the Republic of Kalmykia in September 2022.
An analysis of statements of female respondents has shown that women are ready to “sacrifice” their careers, including political ones, for the sake of the family, and statements of male respondents confirm the patriarchal nature of Tuvan and Kalmyk societies.
References
Aivazova, S. G. (2007) «Igra v gender» na pole rossiiskoi politiki: vozmozhnosti institutsional'nykh izmenenii [“The game in gender” in the field of Russian politics: The possibilities of institutional changes]. In: Rossiia reformiruiushchaiasia [Russia reforming] : A yearbook / ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow, Institute of Sociology of the RAS. Issue 6. Pp. 319–331. (In Russ.).
Barinova, N. V. and Kosorukova, M. I. (2019) Zhenshchina v sovremennoi politicheskoi kul'ture (na primere Rossii i Russkogo Zarubezh'ia) [Woman in modern political culture (on the example of Russia and the Russian diaspora]. Nauka.me, no. 1. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18254/S241328880005606-0
Zadvornova, Yu. S. (2019) Likvidatsiia gendernogo razryva v oplate truda v STEM-otrasliakh kak kliuchevaia zadacha preodoleniia gendernogo neravenstva v stranakh tsifrovoi ekonomikoi [Eliminating the gender wage gap in STEAM industries as a key task of overcoming gender inequalities in countries by means of digital economy], Zhenshchiny v rossiiskom obshchestve, no. 3, pp. 114–120. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2019.3.9
Zdravomyslova, E. A. and Temkina, A. A. (2007) Patriarkhat i «zhenskaia vlast'» [Patriarchy and “women’s power”]. In: Rossiiskii gendernyi poriadok: sotsiologicheskii podkhod [Russian gender order: A sociological approach] / ed. by E. Zdravomyslova and A. Temkina. St. Petersburg, Publishing House of the European University in St. Petersburg. 306 p. Pp. 68–97. (In Russ.).
Kozlova, N. N. (2016) Deputatskii korpus Tsentral'nogo federal'nogo okruga: gendernoe izmerenie [Deputy corps of the Central Federal District: The gender dimension]. Woman in Russian Society, no. 4 (81), pp. 58–71. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2016.4.5
Kozlova, N. N. (2017) Deputatskii korpus regional'nykh parlamentov Iuzhnogo Federal'nogo okruga: opyt gendernogo analiza [Deputy corps of regional parliaments of the Southern Federal District: Experience of gender analysis]. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 68–84. (In Russ.).
Kolesnik, N. V. (2021) Gendernoe (ne)ravenstvo v politicheskoi vlasti rossiiskikh regionov [Gender (in)equality in the political power of Russian regions]. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, no. 4, pp. 468–491. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.4.1652
Kolesnik, N. V. (2022«Khrupkoe neravenstvo», ili zhenshchiny v bol'shoi politike: sluchai administrativnoi elity [“Fragile representation” or women in big politics: The case of the administrative elite]. RUDN Journal of Political Science, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 107–119. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-1-107-119
Coleman, J. (2001) Kapital sotsial'nyi i chelovecheskii [Social and human capital]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost', no. 3, pp. 122–139. (In Russ.).
Kokhanskaia, E. A. (2014) Rol' gendernogo faktora v formirovanii regional'noi elity [The role of the gender factor in the formation of the regional elite]. Vlast', no. 10, pp. 98–104. (In Russ.).
Kranzeeva, E. A. (2021) Izmeneniia politicheskogo soznaniia i povedeniia rossiiskikh zhenshchin: vyzovy tsifrovizatsii [Changes in political consciousness and behavior of Russian women. Challenges of digitalization]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriia “Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Iskusstvovedenie”, no. 1 (part 2), pp. 258–266. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2021-1-258-266
Lippman, W. (2004) Obshchestvennoe mnenie [Public opinion]. Moscow, Institute of the Foundation “Obshhestvennoe mnenie”. 384 p. (In Russ.).
Natsak, O. D. (2022) Gendernoe izmerenie tuvinskoi politiki (sovetskii opyt i postsovetskaia praktika) [Gender dimension of Tuvan politics (Soviet experience and post-Soviet practice)] Obshchestvo: sotsiologiia, psikhologiia, pedagogika, no. 6, pp. 28–38. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2022.6.3
Ochirova, V. M. (2011) Zhenshchiny v sostave regional'nykh politicheskikh elit: k probleme predstavitel'stva [Women in the composition of regional political elites: To the problem of representation]. Vlast', no. 12, pp. 57–60. (In Russ.).
Putnam, R. (1996) Chtoby demokratiia srabotala. Grazhdanskie traditsii v sovremennoi Italii [Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy]. Moscow, Ad Marginem. 287 p. (In Russ.).
Pushkareva, N. L. and Zhidchenko, A.V. (2021) Zhenskie imena v nazvaniiakh ulits tuvinskikh gorodov kak problema sokhraneniia sotsial'noi pamiati etnosa [Streets named after females in Tuva as a case of preserving the social memory of an ethnicity]. New Research of Tuva, no. 1, pp. 188–201. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2021.1.10
Smelser, N. (1994) Sotsiologiia [Sociology] / transl. from English, edited by V. A. Yadov. Moscow, Feniks. 688 p. (In Russ.).
Fukuyama, F. (2002) Sotsial'nyj kapital [Social capital]. In: Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuiut obshchestvennomu progressu [Culture matters: How values shape human progress] / ed. by L. Harrison, S. Huntington, transl. from Engl. Moscow, Moscow School of Political Studies. 320 p. Pp. 129–148. (In Russ.).
Khotkina, Z. A. (2018) Na puti k tsifrovomu gendernomu ravenstvu [Towards the digital gender equality]. Woman in Russian Society, no. 3, pp. 5–13. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21064/WinRS.2018.3.1
Chirikova, A. E. and Lapina, I. Yu. (2009) Zhenshchina na vysshikh eshelonakh vlasti. Rossiiskie praktiki i frantsuzskii opyt [Woman in the upper echelons of power. Russian practices and French experience]. Moscow, Institute of Sociology of the RAS. 72 p. (In Russ.).
Sztompka, P. (2021) Doverie — osnova obshchestva [Trust is the foundation of society]. Moscow, Logos. 445 p. (In Russ.).
Published
How to Cite
For citation:
Natsak O. D. and Badmaeva N. V. Zhenshchiny v sovremennoi politike v Respublike Tyva i Respublike Kalmykiia (po materialam sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniia) [Women in contemporary politics in the Republic of Tuva and the Republic of Kalmykia (based on a sociological study)]. New Research of Tuva, 2022, no. 4, pp. 225-242 (In Russ.). DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.4.17
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.