The ethics of using anonymous sources in journalistic investigations: Perceptions of Kazakhstani citizens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2026.2.17Keywords:
ethics, trust, protection of journalists’ rights, Kazakhstan, anonymous source, journalistic investigationAbstract
This article examines the ethics of using anonymous sources in journalistic investigations considering perceptions of Kazakhstan’s citizens. Contemporary journalism often faces the need to work with anonymous sources. This raises questions about the reliability, ethicality and safety of this practice. The aim of the study is to analyze citizens’ attitudes toward the use of anonymous sources in journalistic investigations within the context of Kazakhstani society. The research objectives are to identify their perceptions of the risks and benefits of using anonymous information in journalism.
To achieve these objectives, a survey was conducted among 100 respondents from various social groups not directly involved in journalistic activities. The study included questions regarding the significance of journalistic investigations, attitudes toward anonymous sources, trust in investigative results and opinions on the sufficiency of legal protection for journalists and their sources in Kazakhstan. An analysis of the results has shown that most of the respondents support the use of anonymous sources, but they express concerns about potential manipulation, information distortion and loss of trust in the media.
Notably, 70% of the respondents consider the protection of journalists’ and anonymous sources’ rights in Kazakhstan to be insufficient, highlighting the need for legal reforms to improve safety and confidentiality.
The article also offers recommendations for improving journalistic practice, including enhancing legal protection for journalists, increasing transparency and information verification, as well as adhering to ethical standards when using anonymous sources. The findings of this study are significant for media professionals and lawmakers who seek to ensure a balance between freedom of speech and source safety.
References
Aigelova, А. M. and Ishanovа, А. K. (2023) Problems of fake news analysis in social media. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Journalism Series, no. 1 (142), pp. 97–103. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7174-2023-142-1-97-103
Akessina, A. and Dyussenbekova, M. (2024) Voices in transition: Understanding freedom of expression as a political value in contemporary Kazakhstan. Qogam jane Dauir, vol. 2, no. 82, pp. 20–29.
Allen, D. S. (2008) The trouble with transparency: The challenge of doing journalism ethics in a surveillance society. Journalism Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 323–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700801997224
Banisar, D. (2007) Silencing sources: An international survey of protections and threats to journalists’ sources. London, Privacy International. 97 p. (Privacy International Global Survey Series). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1706688
Bīriņa, L. (2019) Intelligence activities’ impact on journalists’ information source protection — Case law of the European Court of Human Rights. In: Protecting values enshrined in Constitution: Perspectives of different fields of law : A collection of research papers of the 77th International Scientific Conference of the University of Latvia. Riga, University of Latvia Press. Pp. 335–342. (In Latvian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.77.35
Biscop, M. and Décary-Hétu, D. (2022) Anonymity technologies in investigative journalism: A tool for inspiring trust in sources. Journalism Practice, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1420–1441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2113740
Bisilki, I. and Opoku, R. O. (2018) Investigative journalism in Ghana, challenges and ethical contentions. Journal of Social Science Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 68–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jsss.v6i1.13823
Blankenburg, W. B. (1992) The utility of anonymous attribution. Newspaper Research Journal, vol. 13, no. 1–2, pp. 10–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073953299201300103
Carlson, M. (2010) Whither anonymity? Journalism and unnamed sources in a changing media environment. In: Journalists, Sources, and Credibility. New York, Routledge. Pp. 37–48. DOI:
Devaraj, S., Alfred, M., Madathil, K. C. and Gramopadhye, A. K. (2015) An investigation of the factors that predict an internet user’s perception of anonymity on the web. In: Tryfonas, T. and Askoxylakis, I. (eds.) Human aspects of information security, privacy, and trust. HAS 2015. Lecture notes in computer science. Cham, Springer. Vol. 9190. Pp. 311–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20376-8_28
Di Salvo, P. (2022) “We have to act like our devices are already infected”: Investigative journalists and internet surveillance. Journalism Practice, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1849–1866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2014346
Etumnu, E. W., Fab-Ukozor, N., Ojiakor-Umenze, I. and Williams-Etumnu, O. (2024) Are journalists truly safe? Communicating the risks faced by investigative journalists in Nigeria. Studies in Humanities and Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 25–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48185/she.v5i2.1256
Garling, M. (1979) Journalists. In: The Human Rights Handbook. London, Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 144–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16048-8_14
Gohdes, A. R. and Carey, S. C. (2017) Canaries in a coal-mine? What the killings of journalists tell us about future repression. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 157–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316680859
Gokhale, S. and Mate, R. (2024) Press freedom in Asian countries (2010–2023): A systematic literature review. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 7453–7461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4177
Goniak, Ł. P. (2023) Journalists’ abuse of (the right) to the anonymity. Dual practical-legal perspective. Roczniki Nauk Spolecznych, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 119–142. (In Polish). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rns2023.0003
Grabelnikov, A. A. and Mambetova, I. K. (2015) Freedom of journalists’ speech and safety as actual problem of Kazakh media. RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, no. 3, pp. 129–137. (In Russ.).
Hanitzsch, T. et al. (2011) Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 273–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.512502
Jaisal, M. K. (2024) Behind the headlines unmasking truths of the tragedy: Review of “The Railway Men: The Untold Story of Bhopal 1984”. Journal of Communication and Management, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 187–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58966/JCM20243217
Kurak, G. K., Kabylgazina, K. and Shindaliyeva, M. B. (2022) Investigative journalism in Kazakh-speaking mass media: History and practice. Herald of Journalism, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 15–27. (In Kazakh). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26577/HJ.2022.v64.i2.02
Kurambayev, B. and Freedman, E. (2020) Ethics and journalism in Central Asia: A comparative study of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Journal of Media Ethics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 31–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2019.1700119
Kurambayev, B. and Myssayeva, K. (2023) An examination of the use of fake names among Central Asian journalists. Journal of Media Ethics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 48–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2022.2158830
Lee, N. Y., Kim, C. and Kim. J. (2021) A study on the journalism practice of anonymous news sources of political news: A comparative analysis of Korean newspapers and the New York Times. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 5–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2021.65.3.001
McQuail, D. (2002) McQuail’s reader in mass communication theory. London, Sage Publications. xxiv, 427 p.
Morgner, C. (2018) Trust and society: Suggestions for further development of Niklas Luhmann’s theory of trust. Canadian Review of Sociology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 232–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12191
Mussa, N., and Myssayeva, K. N. (2024) The role of journalists covering conflicts in Kazakhstan. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Journalism Series, no. 3 (148), pp. 109–122. (In Kazakh). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7174-2024-148-3-109-122
Purvis, H. (2015) Anonymous sources: More or less and why and where? Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, vol. 30, no. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58997/smc.v30i2.11
Pjesivac, I. and Rгш, R. (2014) Anonymous sources hurt credibility of news stories across cultures: A comparative experiment in America and China. International Communication Gazette, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 641–660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048514548534
Rains, S. A. (2007) The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 100–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206296084
Rakhymzhanova, L. and Alzhan, А. (2023) COVID-19: Analysis of disinformation spread in the media of Kazakhstan in 2020. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Journalism Series, no. 2 (143), pp. 40–46. (In Kazakh). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7174-2023-143-2-40-46
Ryskeldinova, S. B. and Sak, K. O. (2021) Freedom of speech as a key condition for democracy. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Journalism Series, no. 1 (134), pp. 27–36. (In Kazakh). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7174-2021-134-1-27-36
Sternadori, M. M. and Thorson, E. (2009) Anonymous sources harm credibility of all stories. Newspaper Research Journal, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 54–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290903000405
Sylvie, G. (2001) The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 851–853.
Tazhibayev, G. (2023) Bibliography history of the development of mass media law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of Yassawi University, no. 1 (127), pp. 540–554. (In Kazakh). DOI: https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-1/2664-0686.42
Tsfati, Y. (2003) Does audience skepticism of the media matter in agenda setting? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 157–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4702_1
Urbániková, M. and Smejkal, K. (2023) Trust and distrust in public service media: A case study from the Czech Republic. Media and Communication, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 297–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i4.7053
Utemissov, Z. Z. and Koshkenov, N. Zh. (2021) Kazakhstan media challenges in the context of media and government relations in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Journalism Series, no. 1 (134), pp. 37–51. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-7174-2021-134-1-37-51
Wasserman, E. (2017) Safeguarding the news in the era of disruptive sources. Journal of Media Ethics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 72–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2017.1294020
Wilson, S. (2010) Source usage and news credibility in two Malaysian crime cases. Akademika, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 43–51.
Wulfemeyer, K. T. (1983). Use of anonymous sources in journalism. Newspaper Research Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 43–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073953298300400205
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Для цитирования:
Atay Sh. A. and Burkitbayeva A. Sh. The ethics of using anonymous sources in journalistic investigations: Perceptions of Kazakhstani citizens // Новые исследования Тувы. 2026. № 2. С. 269-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25178/nit.2026.2.17
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Author(s) license holder(s) grant rights for their work to the journal (grantee of a license) under the simple non-exclusive open license in accordance with Art. 1286.1 «Open license for a research work, work of literature or fine arts», Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
New Research of Tuva publishes articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (CC BY-NC).
Since it is an open license, author(s) reserve the right to upload the article to their institutional repository, submit it to another journal (if it allows republications), or republish it on their own website (in full, or in part).
However, several conditions apply here:
a) The republished version must always contain the name(s) and affiliation(s) of the author(s), the original title and the hyperlink to the original version on the New Research of Tuva website;
b) It must be in open access, free of charge, and no category of readers must be in any way whatsoever advantaged over general readership.
c) should the contribution be submitted elsewhere by its author(s) without substantial modification (30% or more of original text unchanged), the body of the article should contain a disclaimer that the original version was published in New Research of Tuva (with a link to the respective page)
The CC-BY-NC is a non-revocable license which applies worldwide and lasts for the duration of the work’s copyright.


